Deciphering Ecolabels for Greener Schools

For school facility managers, architects, designers and even school faculty and administration, credible certifications and their ecolabels make it possible to find greener, healthier products with which to build, furnish and maintain school facilities. However, not all certifications and ecolabels conform to the same principles or set of standards, so knowing the differences between them is important.

Types of Certifications
Third-party — A certification carried out by an impartial, independent organization for conformance to a specific standard, third-party certification is considered the most credible for its objectivity and rigor. Often, though not always, third-party certification also involves science-based testing and data analysis.

Third-party certification to both single- and multi-attribute environmental standards is possible. Examples include EcoLogo, GREENGUARD, Green Seal and UL Environment certification.

By contrast, first-party certification is a self-declaration whereby an organization providing a good or service makes and backs up its own environmental claims without third-party substantiation. And second-party certification is a declaration made by an organization that appears to be a third-party but, in reality, has ties to the manufacturer of the product it is certifying. First- and second-party certifications are less credible due to their potential for bias.

Multi-attribute — Multi-attribute certifications take into account every phase of a product’s lifecycle, including:
  • impacts of harvesting the raw materials,
  • manufacturing process,
  • use of the product itself,
  • distribution and
  • disposal (or recycling/re-use).
The benefit of a multi-attribute certification is that it assures a specifier that multiple environmental impacts of a particular product have been addressed. Examples are UL Environment, EcoLogo and Green Seal.

Single-attribute — Single-attribute certifications address 
one environmental impact category only, such as energy efficiency, indoor air quality or recycled content. Examples include GREENGUARD Certification, ENERGY STAR and USDA Organic.

Types of Ecolabels
Type 1 Ecolabel — Defined by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) as third-party verified ecolabels, these 
represent lifecycle-based, multi-attribute certifications. UL 
Environment, EcoLogo and Green Seal offer Type 1 ecolabels.

Type 2 Ecolabel — Described by ISO as a label representing a self-declared environmental claim, Type 2 ecolabels lack verification by an independent party.

Type 3 Ecolabel — Defined by ISO as a label that represents a third-party certified Environmental Product Declaration, a Type 3 ecolabel is a detailed report about a product’s cradle-to-grave environmental impacts. Type 3 ecolabels do not define or assess the product’s performance against any standards.

How to Evaluate Ecolabels
When sizing up an ecolabel’s credibility, ask yourself, who’s vouching for the ecolabel — a reputable third party, or a first or second party? Do your homework and see what information you can find about the ecolabel. In general, the more scientific information available, the more credible that ecolabel is.

Are the sustainability performance standards against which the product is certified science-based? Are they available to the public? A legitimate ecolabel should have nothing to hide and its scientific standards should be easily accessible.

Does the label address the health or environmental impact 
that is most important to you? Not all certifications address individual environmental impacts equally. In general, third-
party certifications that address a product’s indoor air quality performance are critical for schools. For this reason, look for either single-attribute indoor air quality certifications (e.g. GREENGUARD Children & Schools Certification for building products and furniture) or multi-attribute environmental certifications that take into account a product’s indoor air quality performance along with other environmental impact categories (e.g. UL Environment certification for cleaning products and printers).

Admittedly, determining which ecolabels are trustworthy can seem daunting. But once you’ve armed yourself with the knowledge to make those determinations, you’ll be well on your way to creating healthier, more environmentally responsible learning environments for students and staff. 

Steve Wenc is president of UL Environment. UL Environment provides environmental claims validation, multi-attribute product certification, environmental product declarations, indoor air quality certification, product emissions testing, organizational sustainability certification and consulting. Learn more at www.ul.com/environment.

Featured

  • Niles West High School Natatorium Renovation

    Natatoriums are highly specialized spaces, and luminaires in this setting face several unique challenges. Perhaps the most significant is corrosion, which is exacerbated by high indoor humidity, condensation, and pool chemicals, often resulting in material degradation in luminaires not certified to perform in corrosive environments.

  • DLR Group Appoints New K–12 Education Practice Leader

    Integrated design firm DLR Group recently announced that it has named its new global K–12 Education leader, Senior Principal Carmen Wyckoff, AIA, LEED AP, according to a news release. Her teams have members in all 36 of the firm’s offices in the U.S., Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Europe, and Asia.

  • UNL Kiewit Hall

    Designing for Engineering Excellence: Integrating Sustainability and Wellness at UNLs Kiewit Hall

    Kiewit Hall at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln exemplifies how academic institutions can integrate sustainability and wellness into modern learning environments. With an integrated and collaborative team approach, Kiewit Hall addresses enhanced learning and creativity, physical health, and mental wellness, and fosters a sense of community through innovative design, operations, and policy solutions.

  • Spaces4Learning Trends & Predictions for Educational Facilities in 2026: Part II

    As education leaders look toward 2026, the design of K–12 and higher education facilities is being reshaped by powerful, converging forces. Survey respondents point to the rapid growth of Career and Technical Education, deeper alignment with workforce and industry needs, and the accelerating influence of AI and emerging technologies.

Digital Edition