What Do Colleges Need? Authenticity.

Last year we had a young man and his parents visit our small campus in rural Marlboro, VT. The parents, like many, asked questions about our academics, campus safety and our dorms. My conversation with the student, whose grades were good, centered on his interests, namely sports and academics. He liked the sciences. When I asked where else he was planning on visiting, he told me the University of Vermont. My response to him was, “you’ll really like it there.”

During our conversation it became apparent that Marlboro was not the right place for this student. So, rather than encouraging him to apply, we talked about other schools that I thought he would like. My interview with this young man ended with my wishing him the best of luck and encouraging him to reach out to me with any questions he might have about the process. I told him that I was most concerned with his finding a school that would be the best fit for him and if that was somewhere other than Marlboro I was still happy to help.

For many of my colleagues in admissions this would be unthinkable. After all, with the number of college-bound high school seniors shrinking each year, the competition for every student can be fierce. So why would I encourage a student not to apply? The answer is simple — we were not a good fit.

The Truth of the Matter

It’s easy to say that colleges and universities don’t have a prospective student’s best interests in mind, but I don’t think that’s entirely true. Very few college admissions officers that I know want students for a semester or a year, only to have them either drop out or transfer. It doesn’t help build long-term affinity for your institution. But what seems to be broken is the business model that many institutions operate under.

Today’s admissions process tends to be about pre-awarding, inflating the prospective applicant pool and extensive naming searches — most often in the tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands for the largest institutions. The problem with casting the nets wide is that they don’t tend to actually lead to viable students.

There are positives and negatives to a more authentic admissions approach. The negatives, of course, are that some view buying lots of names as a security blanket. If we don’t get what we want from “Pool A” we can always turn to “Pool B.” But for a school like Marlboro, there is no such thing as “Pool B.” Instead, we operate under the philosophy of “more conversations and less applications.”

Authenticity in college admissions requires institutions to value prospective students’ interests over a college’s bottom line. In my conversation with the previously mentioned student and his family, I could tell he was an athlete and looking for a school that would allow him to compete at a certain level. So, while academically he would have loved our school, broomball, four square and cross-country skiing were not exactly the kind of collegiate athletic experience he was hoping for.

Many colleges and universities talk about “fit” in the admissions process but few actually deliver. In fact, in some admissions offices’ “fit” can be judged on a student’s ability to pay, or it can be used to describe if a student has the grades or test scores for admission. What we should be talking about here is how will this student help shape our campus and how will our institution help mold this student.

When It’s Just Not a Fit

If I had to guess, I could say that we will encourage roughly a third of the students who initially approach us to apply elsewhere because we are not a good fit for them. As a small school working to keep our enrollment up, I can see where many would question the logic in this. But for me it comes down to investing in the student and in a commitment to helping them make what will be one of the most impactful decisions of their life.

When prospective students and their families visit our campus they see Marlboro as it really is. There is no prepared script for our tour guides, only talking points that we all agree are important. Classroom visits are scheduled based on the visitors’ interests, not on who we think will deliver the most attractive message of what education looks like at Marlboro. Because of this, we often see little or no “melt” with our deposited students. They know what to expect.

So, while we all understand that we are ultimately responsible for increasing our institution’s enrollment, it’s up to admissions offices at colleges and universities throughout the country to remember to do what is in the best interests of our students.

This article originally appeared in the issue of .

About the Author

Brigid Lawler is dean of admissions at Marlboro College in Marlboro, VT (www.marlboro.edu).

Featured

  • i-PRO, NovoTrax Partner for New School Emergency Response Solution

    i-PRO Americas, Inc., which manufactures edge computing cameras, recently announced a partnership with NovoTrax, provider of end-to-end life safety and mass notification solutions, to address gaps in emergency response workflows at K–12 schools, according to a news release.

  • Ancient Resilience: How Indigenous Intelligence Shapes the 4Roots Education Building

    As climate change intensifies, educational spaces must evolve beyond basic sustainability toward true resilience – we must design environments that can adapt, respond, and thrive amid shifting, and intensifying, climate hazards. Drawing on indigenous wisdom and nature-based strategies, integrating resilient design offers a path to create learning environments that are not only functional but deeply in tune with their natural surroundings.

  • K–12 Safety Trends Report Reveals Reliance on Training, Technology

    Wearable safety technology provider CENTEGIX recently released its 2025 School Safety Trends Report, according to a news release. The report is based on more than 265,000 incidents during the 2024–25 school year as reported through the CENTEGIX Safety Platform, used by more than 800 school districts across the U.S.

  • Key Considerations for Office-to-Higher-Education Facility Conversions

    Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, office-to-alternative-use conversions have become a recurring subject of urban development discourse. Office utilization rates across major U.S. cities remain below 50%, with vacancy rates exceeding 27% in San Francisco and 16% in New York. Higher education facilities present programmatic and spatial use cases that align readily with the typical characteristics of commercial office buildings.

Digital Edition