Problem (not) Solved

There is rarely time for us to get everything done that needs done, which also means there is never time to look back and see if we made progress. In my library is a copy of an old book, “Planning Schools for Tomorrow: The Issues Involved.” If I removed the reference to the year (which was 1942), you would think it was written yesterday. The issues they faced in 1942 were not so different than the issues we face today.

The same is true of their goals. “1.) A full program of education adapted to the capacities and interests of all the individuals whom the schools should serve. 2.) Carefully selected teachers, supervisors, administrators and specialists such as nurses, physicians, dentists, psychiatrists, librarians etc., who are competent, well-prepared and interested in the development of community life. 3.) Safe and sanitary school buildings, adapted to the education experiences and services to be offered, and adequate grounds and suitable equipment and instructional materials. 4.) An effective state and local organization, coordinated with other state and local educational and social agencies, which make possible the efficient offering of needed educational services. Advisory service from the federal government should be available. 5.) Adequate and joint support by the local, state and federal governments.”

When it came to facilities, the conversation was about accessibility; adequacy with respect to needed services; adequacy with respect to size; arrangement; utilization; possibility of rearrangement; and the possibility of expansion — conversations we are still having nearly 75 years later.

Adequate funding for education was, and still is, a concern. During the year that ended June 30, 1940, the U.S. spent approximately $2.7 billion for public elementary, secondary and higher education. The book says, “To offer the education program needed in this country would require a minimum expenditure of approximately $5 billion a year for regular current expenses. An additional $5 billion at least, is needed for the repair of old, and the construction of new, school buildings.”

The concern remains the same, but the dollars needed and being spent have increased. The projected current expenditures for elementary and secondary schools in 2015 is $576 billion; and according to the SP&M research on school construction, nearly $12.9 billion in construction was completed in 2015 (see page 17 for details). While increased funding may have improved some things, we still have a long way to go. Seventy-five years later and the issues remain the same!

This article originally appeared in the issue of .

Featured

  • Wold Completes Geothermal Projects at Two Minnesota Schools

    Wold Architects & Engineers recently announced that it has completed two geothermal expansion projects for Mounds View Public Schools in Shoreview, Minn., according to a news release. The work at Highview Middle School and Irondale High School serves the district’s long-term goal of reducing energy costs and dependency on non-renewable fuel sources, as well as improving building performance.

  • St. John Fisher University

    Classroom Revitalization – Basil Hall Room 216

    Established in 1999, the Education Design Showcase is a vehicle for showing off innovative — yet practical — solutions in planning, design, architecture, and construction. St. John Fisher University's Basil Hall Room 216 Classroom Revitalization has been recognized with an EDS 2026 Project of Distinction award in the category of Spaces.

  • Texas District Breaks Ground on Second High School

    The Waller Independent School District in Waller, Texas, recently held a groundbreaking ceremony for what will become its second high school, according to a news release.

  • Designing for Every Mind

    Learning environments have the power to shape not just what students know, but who they become. When a school is designed with genuine empathy—for the full range of ways students think, sense, and engage with the world—it becomes more than a building. It becomes a catalyst for growth, confidence, and belonging. That is the animating idea behind neurodiverse design, and it is one that is transforming how more architects and designers are thinking about school design.