Problem (not) Solved

There is rarely time for us to get everything done that needs done, which also means there is never time to look back and see if we made progress. In my library is a copy of an old book, “Planning Schools for Tomorrow: The Issues Involved.” If I removed the reference to the year (which was 1942), you would think it was written yesterday. The issues they faced in 1942 were not so different than the issues we face today.

The same is true of their goals. “1.) A full program of education adapted to the capacities and interests of all the individuals whom the schools should serve. 2.) Carefully selected teachers, supervisors, administrators and specialists such as nurses, physicians, dentists, psychiatrists, librarians etc., who are competent, well-prepared and interested in the development of community life. 3.) Safe and sanitary school buildings, adapted to the education experiences and services to be offered, and adequate grounds and suitable equipment and instructional materials. 4.) An effective state and local organization, coordinated with other state and local educational and social agencies, which make possible the efficient offering of needed educational services. Advisory service from the federal government should be available. 5.) Adequate and joint support by the local, state and federal governments.”

When it came to facilities, the conversation was about accessibility; adequacy with respect to needed services; adequacy with respect to size; arrangement; utilization; possibility of rearrangement; and the possibility of expansion — conversations we are still having nearly 75 years later.

Adequate funding for education was, and still is, a concern. During the year that ended June 30, 1940, the U.S. spent approximately $2.7 billion for public elementary, secondary and higher education. The book says, “To offer the education program needed in this country would require a minimum expenditure of approximately $5 billion a year for regular current expenses. An additional $5 billion at least, is needed for the repair of old, and the construction of new, school buildings.”

The concern remains the same, but the dollars needed and being spent have increased. The projected current expenditures for elementary and secondary schools in 2015 is $576 billion; and according to the SP&M research on school construction, nearly $12.9 billion in construction was completed in 2015 (see page 17 for details). While increased funding may have improved some things, we still have a long way to go. Seventy-five years later and the issues remain the same!

This article originally appeared in the issue of .

Featured

  • Ohio State University Opens 26-Story Hospital

    The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center recently opened in Columbus, Ohio, standing 26 stories and covering 1.9 million square feet, according to a university news release. The project marks ten years of effort and is the university’s largest single-facility construction project ever.

  • Tennessee Middle School Completes Health, Life Safety Renovations

    The Giles County Board of Education in Pulaski, Tenn., recently announced that a series of renovation projects has been completed at Bridgeforth Middle School, according to a news release. The district partnered with Wold Architects & Engineers and Brindley Construction to modernize building systems at one of the district’s oldest schools.

  • From Approval to Opening: Inside Travis Unified School District’s Fast Tracked Campus Expansion

    The Travis Unified School District (TUSD) in northern California includes several elementary and high schools serving over 5,400 students. In 2024, the TUSD Board approved the addition of sixth grade to the Golden West Middle School campus for the 2025–26 school year, setting in motion an accelerated effort to bring new facilities online in less than a year.

  • Universities Continue to Launch Multimillion-Dollar Campus Transformations

    What makes the current wave of campus development especially noteworthy is its emphasis on multi-use functionality and community integration. Institutions are no longer investing solely in academic or athletic facilities in isolation. Instead, they are creating destinations that blend recreation, health, housing, and event-driven economic activity.