Useful or Frivolous?

This February issue of College Planning & Management includes our annual Facilities & Construction Brief. For this report, we surveyed you, our readers, to ask about construction on your campuses. You generously provided information on what projects have been recently completed, as well as plans for construction that will wrap up or get underway this year.

The outlook is not bleak. More than three-quarters of respondents completed construction projects in 2017. Close to three-quarters of respondents indicated that they will complete projects this year, and as many will start projects this year as well.

You are balancing these campus improvements—because whether new-from-the-ground-up, additions, or renovations, these construction projects are improving campus life—against a number of challenges. Challenges that include budget and funding issues (although 39 percent saw no change in available funds and 18 percent noted that more funds are becoming available for construction); complying with local, state, and federal rules and regulations; deferred maintenance backlogs on existing building stock; timing and scheduling constraints; customer (student, administrative, community) expectations; labor and materials availability and quality concerns; weather; and more.

Looking forward to the April issue, we will be featuring our annual Campus Housing Report. The survey underway for that report asks not only nuts-and-bolts questions about what residential projects have been completed, are in the works, or are on the boards (as this Facilities & Construction Brief survey did), but also asks about amenities included within those facilities. If we had asked for these details in the Facilities & Construction Brief, the answers would involve everything from replacing the leaky roof on the campus library to constructing a multi-million-dollar sports, recreation, and fitness facility with amenities that include a hydrotherapy suite, movie theater, climbing wall, and lazy river.

A lazy river?

Yes. Albeit a somewhat small trend, several institutions have installed lazy river features in their athletic facilities… at considerable cost and, in the opinion of many, the epitome of “unnecessary.” Still, one school’s “unnecessary” may be another school’s most successful tool for recruiting and retaining students, faculty, and staff.

Campus facilities are not, and never will be, one-size-fits-all. Whether features included in your projects are considered useful or frivolous, you continue to design, build, furnish, and maintain the very best facilities you can. And you get the job done.

This article originally appeared in the College Planning & Management February 2018 issue of Spaces4Learning.

Featured

  • Compton High School

    Compton High School

    Established in 1999, the Education Design Showcase is a vehicle for showing off innovative — yet practical — solutions in planning, design, architecture, and construction. Compton High School has been recognized with an EDS 2026 Project of Distinction award in the category of New Construction.

  • KWK Architects Announces Full Transition to Lawrence Group Branding

    KWK Architects recently announced that it will complete its transition to the Lawrence Group brand effective July 1, according to a news release. The merger marks the end of a three-year strategic integration process that began in March 2023 to unite the firms.

  • CU-Lock Haven Receives $1.75M Gift for New Entrepreneurship, Media Center

    Commonwealth University-Lock Haven in Lock Haven, Penn., recently received a $1.75-million donation from entrepreneur and alumnus Nicholas Subich ’17, according to a university news release. The funds will go toward establishing the Nicholas Subich Center for Entrepreneurship and Media, a technology-driven hub for innovation and experiential learning.

  • Higher Ed is Betting on New Buildings While Quietly Undermining Their Campuses — Here’s Why

    In this climate, the owner’s representative has changed from a delivery-focused advisor to a strategic campus partner. Institutions are increasingly relying on owner’s reps not just to manage, cope, schedule, and budget, but also help evaluate whether a project should proceed at all.