Does It Matter?

Do the facilities in which higher education takes place really matter? Do colleges and universities need shiny new state-of-the-art, visually appealing buildings in order to achieve their mission? If you answered “yes,” what does that say about institutions that hold classes in leased space in an office park, or a sparsely converted storefront, or those who operate without buildings at all, but instead instructors teach online to students scattered at a distance in their homes, learning in their living rooms or kitchens?

I spent my first two years of higher ed in a small community college in the northeast. At the time I attended, the building was relatively new. Three years old, to be exact. Before that, the college “cheerfully camped out in a colorful succession of utilitarian premises” in the downtown of its community home. The story of the new campus—one sizable, rambling building built in three terraced levels into a hillside—was that it was originally designed to be built in California, and there was, allegedly, an identical campus somewhere in California. California and Massachusetts have different weather patterns. Vast expanses of glass on the building made it a chilly place to be in the winter, and completely enclosed outdoor courtyards on the upper terraces saw accumulations of snow that couldn’t be easily removed but instead were simply piled up to the side with walking paths shoveled through the middle.

In addition, there was a considerable amount of clay in the soil beneath the campus. This meant that the building was very, very slowly sliding down (or at least resettling on) the hillside upon which it was built, which led to repeated misalignments of the one elevator in the facility.

With all that said, I felt that I received an excellent education during my two years at this school. I was aware of the less-than-ideal aspects of the building—especially in the winter—but none of them prevented me from doing what I was there to do; further my education.

In this issue of College Planning & Management, we are featuring the winners of our annual Education Design Showcase. The outstanding projects featured in the showcase range from an 825,600-square-foot campus master plan to a 10,000-square-foot renovated learning space. Ultimately, all these featured projects will achieve their intended goal: educating the students who come to learn within them. Congratulations to the winners!

This article originally appeared in the College Planning & Management June 2019 issue of Spaces4Learning.

Featured

  • Embry-Riddle Completes Construction on Research, Lab Facility

    Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (ERAU) in Daytona Beach, Fla., recently announced the end of construction on a new research and lab facility on campus. The Center for Aerospace Engineering II (CAT II) will support aerospace research and technology development and broke ground last summer.

  • Dallas ISD Voters Approve $6.2B Bond Package

    Dallas ISD voters have approved a record-setting $6.2-billion bond package that district leaders say will modernize aging campuses, eliminate portable classrooms and reshape learning environments across one of the nation’s largest school systems.

  • UCF Modernizes College of Hospitality Management

    The University of Central Florida in Orlando, Fla., recently completed a major renovation effort for the Rosen College of Hospitality Management, according to a news release. The project modernized 77,600 square feet worth of academic classrooms, teaching labs, and collaborative spaces to support both students and faculty.

  • Rethinking K-12 Schools as a Continuous Learning Experience

    Most students move through three or more separate facilities during their K-12 journey, yet the built environments they encounter at each stage have traditionally been designed in isolation, with little continuity in spatial language, learning philosophy, or physical resources. Each new school is a reset with different layouts, learning models, expectations, and ways of moving through a building. The next generation of school design is making the case that the first day of kindergarten and the last day of high school can and should feel connected through common support systems and infrastructure in the physical environment.