Unsung Heroes

The school year winding down, and most students are off to a relaxing summer vacation. The same can’t be said for the facilities and maintenance staff at our schools and colleges. Their summer “to-do” list includes everything from cleaning spaces; to repairing or replacing carpet, ceilings, lights, windows, locks, HVAC and mechanical systems; to completing small-scale capital improvement programs or finishing up facilities that will open in the fall. Already a herculean task, they are now being asked to do this with less staff, less money and in buildings that are on the verge of falling apart.

Maintenance budgets at many institutions have been cut, and the effect is becoming noticeable. Once-available dollars are now being withheld or diverted to salaries, unfunded mandates or more popular/visible projects. Unfortunately, too many people involved in the shuffle of dollars have no idea how devastating the consequences of deferring maintenance can be. The lack of resources (people and dollars) has reduced planned maintenance and all but eliminated predictive and preventive maintenance in many schools. Leaving institutions with barely enough staff and dollars to handle emergencies.

When The American Society of Civil Engineers released their “2013 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure,” schools scored a “D”… a near failing grade. The Center for Green Schools reports that a half trillion — yes trillion — dollars is needed to update our schools. Their researchers estimated schools spent $211 billion on upkeep between 1995 and 2008, but needed to spend $482 billion. The gap — $271 billion — a number that will double over the next decade, will continue to grow exponentially unless action is taken.

An APPA report on higher education states that higher education institutions own some of the most valuable real estate in the world, with some of the most significant architecture, specialized research facilities, and beloved sports complexes. They also report that aging buildings, combined with rising materials and energy costs, can make the physical campus a drag on the institutional budget.

It is not often that we stop and thank those who work in our facilities, custodial or maintenance departments. They deserve our praise. They play a huge role in creating an educational environment that keeps students and staff safe and healthy. They are digging in, looking for efficiencies and doing their jobs even with their hands tied behind their backs!

This article originally appeared in the issue of .

Featured

  • Spaces4Learning Launches 2026 Education Design Showcase Awards

    Spaces4Learning has opened submissions for the 2026 Education Design Showcase! The awards program launched in 1999 with the goal of celebrating innovative, practical solutions in the planning, design, and construction of K–12 and higher-education facilities. EDS recognizes new developments that help achieve optimal learning environments, as well as the architecture firms that brought the ideas to life.

  • Utah Valley University Opens New Engineering Building

    Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah, recently held a grand-opening ceremony for the new Scott M. Smith Engineering Building, according to a news release. The facility is one of the largest engineering buildings in the state at almost 200,000 square feet, and it plays home to the university’s Smith College of Engineering and Technology (SCET).

  • Abstract tech network data connections with orange, blue glowing dots, lines

    3 Trends for Higher Education to Stay Ahead of in 2026

    As universities enter the new year, the question is no longer whether digital transformation is necessary, but how quickly institutions can convert technological potential into strategic advantage.

  • UCNJ Launches $30M Modernization of Physical Education Center

    The Union College of Union County (UCNJ) in Cranford, N.J., recently broke ground on a new $30-million modernization project for its Physical Education Center (PECK), according to a news release. The college partnered with DIGroup Architecture for the project’s design, transitioning the existing 42,000-square-foot structure into a campus hub for student athletics and campus life.

Digital Edition