Problem Solved?

In my library is a copy of an old book, Planning Schools for Tomorrow: The Issues Involved. If I removed the reference to the year (which was 1942), you would think it was written yesterday. When is the last time you heard someone say, “Nothing seems more certain than the fact that the good old days are gone,” or that they were “worried about budget deficits caused by a sagging economy”? The issues they faced in 1942 were not so different than the issues we face today.

The same is true of their goals: “1) A full program of education adapted to the capacities and interests of all the individuals whom the schools should serve. 2) Carefully selected teachers, supervisors, administrators and specialists such as nurses, physicians, dentists, psychiatrists, librarians, etc., who are competent, well-prepared, and interested in the development of community life. 3) Safe and sanitary school buildings, adapted to the education experiences and services to be offered, and adequate grounds and suitable equipment and instructional materials. 4) An effective State and local organization, coordinated with other State and local educational and social agencies, which make possible the efficient offering of needed educational services. Advisory service from the Federal Government should be available. 5) Adequate and joint support by the local, State and Federal Governments.”

When it came to facilities, the conversation was about accessibility; adequacy with respect to needed services; adequacy with respect to size; arrangement; utilization; possibility of rearrangement; and the possibility of expansion — conversations we are still having nearly 75 years later.

Adequate funding for education was — and still is — a concern. During the year that ended June 30, 1940, the U.S. spent approximately $2.7 billion for public elementary, secondary and higher education. The book says, “To offer the education program needed in this country would require a minimum expenditure of approximately 5 billion dollars a year for regular current expenses. An additional 5 billion dollars, at least, is needed for the repair of old, and the construction of new, school buildings.” The concern remains the same, but the dollars needed and being spent have increased.

The projected expenditures for higher education total more than $499 billion; and according to the CP&M research on campus construction, more than $11.6 billion in construction was completed in 2015 (see page 18 for details). While increased funding may have improved some things, we still have a long way to go. Seventy-five years later and the issues still remain the same!

This article originally appeared in the issue of .

Featured

  • LAN, Inc. Opens Office in College Station, Texas

    Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc. (LAN) recently announced the opening of a new office in College Station, Texas, to support its regional client base, according to a news release. The organization provides engineering, design, and program management services for water, wastewater, transportation, stormwater, and education clients in the Brazos Valley.

  • textured paper collage shows a school building on fire as a fire truck sprays water into the flames

    Why a Fire Loss Is More than Flames

    We've all seen what fire damage can do to a property, but the types of damage building owners often encounter after a fire loss can exceed expectations. Having full awareness of the different forms of damage properties can sustain helps owners respond faster, reduce continued damage, and get back on the road to recovery in short order.

  • restroom sinks

    CSU Dominguez Hills Standardizes Plumbing to Improve Restroom Maintenance and Efficiency

    At California State University, Dominguez Hills, facilities leaders have taken steps to standardize restroom fixtures as part of a broader effort to improve maintenance efficiency and control long-term costs.

  • Massachusetts K–12 District Selects Architect for New Junior High

    Swansea Public Schools in Swansea, Mass., recently announced that it has selected Finegold Alexander Architects to design a new junior high school for the district, according to a news release. The firm will create the Feasibility Study and Schematic Design for Joseph Case Junior High School after a lengthy selection process by the Massachusetts School Building Authority (MSBA).

Digital Edition