Does It Matter?

Do the facilities in which higher education takes place really matter? Do colleges and universities need shiny new state-of-the-art, visually appealing buildings in order to achieve their mission? If you answered “yes,” what does that say about institutions that hold classes in leased space in an office park, or a sparsely converted storefront, or those who operate without buildings at all, but instead instructors teach online to students scattered at a distance in their homes, learning in their living rooms or kitchens?

I spent my first two years of higher ed in a small community college in the northeast. At the time I attended, the building was relatively new. Three years old, to be exact. Before that, the college “cheerfully camped out in a colorful succession of utilitarian premises” in the downtown of its community home. The story of the new campus—one sizable, rambling building built in three terraced levels into a hillside—was that it was originally designed to be built in California, and there was, allegedly, an identical campus somewhere in California. California and Massachusetts have different weather patterns. Vast expanses of glass on the building made it a chilly place to be in the winter, and completely enclosed outdoor courtyards on the upper terraces saw accumulations of snow that couldn’t be easily removed but instead were simply piled up to the side with walking paths shoveled through the middle.

In addition, there was a considerable amount of clay in the soil beneath the campus. This meant that the building was very, very slowly sliding down (or at least resettling on) the hillside upon which it was built, which led to repeated misalignments of the one elevator in the facility.

With all that said, I felt that I received an excellent education during my two years at this school. I was aware of the less-than-ideal aspects of the building—especially in the winter—but none of them prevented me from doing what I was there to do; further my education.

In this issue of College Planning & Management, we are featuring the winners of our annual Education Design Showcase. The outstanding projects featured in the showcase range from an 825,600-square-foot campus master plan to a 10,000-square-foot renovated learning space. Ultimately, all these featured projects will achieve their intended goal: educating the students who come to learn within them. Congratulations to the winners!

This article originally appeared in the College Planning & Management June 2019 issue of Spaces4Learning.

Featured

  • Uvalde Schools Receive AI Security Technology through Grant Program

    AI-powered gun detection and emergency response technology solutions provider Omnilert recently launched the Save Haven Grant program, according to a news release. The first recipient of the grant, aimed specifically at schools that have faced gun violence, will be the Uvalde Consolidated Independent School District (Uvalde CISD) in Uvalde, Texas.

  • Tufts University Breaks Ground on Two New Residence Halls

    Tufts University in Medford, Mass., recently broke ground on two new residence halls with a total capacity of 664 beds, according to local news. The project’s ultimate goal is to expand on-campus housing and reduce pressure on the local housing market.

  • Case Study Highlights Texas District’s Campus Security Upgrades

    The Taft Independent School District near Corpus Christi, Texas, recently partnered with Intech Southwest Services to revamp its campus security technology system, according to a news release. Intech has released a case study on its website detailing the process that advanced the district’s technology by more than 20 years in less than three weeks.

  • University of Kentucky Sees Positive Results from Energy Efficiency Program

    The University of Kentucky in Lexington, Ky., recently announced the results of its Energy Program in Facilities Management, put into place eight years ago, according to a news release. Between the fiscal years of 2017 and 2025, the university’s campus grew by 13.6% while the energy use per square foot dropped by 19.2%.

Digital Edition