Skip to main content
Add as a preferred source on Google

SafeGov Releases Results of Global Parents Surveys Relating to Student Online Privacy

  • 09/17/14

Surveys of nearly 5,500 parents in 11 countries around the world, including Europe, Asia and North America, show that parents have high hopes for the contribution that Internet applications can make to their children’s education, especially when it comes to acquiring skills relevant to the modern global economy. At the same time, the vast majority of parents worry that internet companies are tracking and profiling their children’s online activities at school for advertising purposes, and they want such practices banned. Specifically, parents want stronger government regulations against online data mining in schools that isn’t directly related to improving academic performance, and they want schools to forbid such practices.

The findings are based on a series of surveys conducted between 2012 and 2014 for SafeGov aimed at capturing global parents’ views on the benefits and risks of proliferating in-school access to internet applications such as email, document creation and group collaboration.

The surveys show that:

  • Two-thirds of parents are aware that internet companies are tracking and profiling their children’s online behavior and email habits at school for ad-related purposes – parents in Europe, Middle East and Africa are slightly more aware (66%) than in Asia (55%) or the U.S. (51%);
  • Concern about these practices grows as parents learn more about them;
  • 74% of parents want the ability to opt-out of such practices on behalf of their children.

Parents see outright bans against ad-related tracking and profiling in schools as well as stronger government regulations as an indispensable requirement for safe in-school access to internet applications:

  • 88% say schools should require companies to offer a privacy policy with strict guarantees against user profiling that is not related to the delivery of education services
  • 88% say schools should insist on contracts that expressly ban the exploitation of children’s email for non-education purposes
  • 79% support the school adopting rules of conduct forbidding outside companies to profile children
  • 75% support governments passing much stricter laws giving parents complete control over what information, if any, can be collected about their children at school.

While 70% of parents say schools bear the most responsibility to deal with this issue, many also believe parents (31%), internet companies (29%) and the government (24%) have the primary role. Only 5% of parents globally place responsibility on the children themselves.

Featured

  • Spaces4Learning Launches 2026 Facilities and Construction Brief Survey

    Spaces4Learning recently launched the 2026 Facilities and Construction Brief Survey, which collects data on the previous year’s K–12 and higher education construction projects nationwide.

  • Q&A: How to Prevent Kitchen Grease Fires in Commercial Kitchens

    School cafeterias and university dining halls serve thousands of meals daily, relying on high-heat equipment like fryers, grills, and ovens. While these operations keep students fed, they also generate significant grease-laden vapors. Without proper controls, this grease becomes a silent fire threat. As a certified exhaust cleaning specialist and business coach who has helped hundreds of institutional facilities achieve NFPA 96 compliance, I emphasize that proactive grease management isn’t optional; it’s a core fire/life safety practice.

  • Dallas ISD Voters Approve $6.2B Bond Package

    Dallas ISD voters have approved a record-setting $6.2-billion bond package that district leaders say will modernize aging campuses, eliminate portable classrooms and reshape learning environments across one of the nation’s largest school systems.

  • Opportunity by Design Framework

    Opportunity by Design

    Educational improvement efforts often focus on curriculum, instruction, assessment, professional development, and intervention systems while treating the physical school building as background. But school design is not a passive backdrop to learning — it is a structural lever for equity.