Change Isn't Easy

In a perfect world, we would assess the situation and come up with a plan to get us where we want to go. Unfortunately, we don’t live in a perfect world and change doesn’t come easy… especially in education.

Case in point: In 1942, the document, “Planning Schools for Tomorrow: The Issues Involved”, written by J.G. Fowlkes in cooperation with the Committee on Planning for Education of the U.S. Office of Education, addressed the needs and the qualities of a good school, the importance of planning, and the future of our educational system. In 1942, we were concerned that an end to the war would bring about an economic crash. In 2014, we are concerned about recovering from the economic crisis of 2007-2008 and the lingering effects on school budgets.

During the year that ended June 30, 1940, the United States spent approximately $2.7 billion for public elementary, secondary and higher education, but the document stated that, “to offer the education program needed in this country would require a minimum expenditure of approximately 5 billion dollars a year for regular current expenses. An additional 5 billion dollars, at least, is needed for the repair of old, and the construction of new, school buildings.” Current estimates put total expenditures at $604-plus billion, and facilities need at approximately $197 billion.

In 2014, we want to redesign schools to “personalize learning to support the needs and interests of individual students, optimize the pace of learning and customize content and practices for students to master academic content and pursue their interests.” In 1942, we talked about providing “a full program of education adapted to the capacities and interests of all the individuals whom the schools should serve.”

The discussions about physical facilities are the same ones we are having today — the school plant needs were not always determined on the basis of all the criteria needed. Their criteria included accessibility; adequacy with respect to needed services; adequacy with respect to size; arrangement; utilization; possibility of rearrangement; and the possibility of expansion. Sound familiar?

Although the buzz words may have changed in the last 75 years, our basic goals and needs have not. Are we are doing something wrong? Maybe we are doing something right by not giving up on our goals and concept of what is important.

I wish for you a wonderful holiday season and a happy new year!

This article originally appeared in the issue of .

Featured

  • DLR Group Appoints New K–12 Education Practice Leader

    Integrated design firm DLR Group recently announced that it has named its new global K–12 Education leader, Senior Principal Carmen Wyckoff, AIA, LEED AP, according to a news release. Her teams have members in all 36 of the firm’s offices in the U.S., Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Europe, and Asia.

  • UT System Board of Regents Approves $108M Housing Complex

    The University of Texas System Board of Regents recently announced the approval of a new, $108-million housing complex at the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP), according to a news release. The facility will stand four stories and have a total of 456 new beds for freshmen students.

  • Photo credit: Elkus Manfredi Architects

    University of Virginia Selects Design-Build Team for New Residential Complex

    The University of Virginia in Charlottesville, Va., recently announced that it has selected a design-build team for a new upper-class residential development on campus, according to a news release. Capstone Development Partners—in partnership with Elkus Manfredi Architects and the Hoar Construction/Hourigan construction team—will move forward with the three-building, 310,000-square-foot housing facility.

  • Spaces4Learning Trends & Predictions for Educational Facilities in 2026: Part I

    We asked, you answered, and the results are in! Last year, we put out a call for submissions to collect our readership’s opinion on trends and predictions for K–12 and higher education facilities in 2026.