Skip to main content
Add as a preferred source on Google

Managing Delays From the Construction Side

  • 09/01/15

Not all construction delays are the fault of the construction contractor. By keeping the lines of communications open, the client and contractor together can work to avoid any serious slowdowns in the project.

Project managers should be aware of early warning of delays caused by the client, main contractor or your own people. Client delays arise because they may change their minds, give instructions too late or are slow in approving drawings and plans. They tend to overlook the fact that these delays push back the start for contractors or sub-contractors, and that the contractor is powerless to avoid these delays.

Main contractor delays usually involve construction work being completed late, causing subsequent stages to fall behind schedule. In some cases, delays are the result of mismanagement and a lack of coordination.

Last but not least, the subcontractors themselves may cause delays; for example, by under-resourcing the project in the early stages or by not completing design drawings and getting them approved on time.

Make sure delays outside your control are recognized and documented. Such delays can impact you financially and need to be recorded and the financial impact dealt with by the responsible party. You should not have to bear the cost of other peoples’ delays, nor should you be blamed for them.

This article originally appeared in the issue of .

Featured

  • Chartwells Launches Campus Dining Evaluation Framework

    Contract food-service management provider Chartwells Higher Education recently announced the launch of BLUEPRINT, according to a news release. The evaluation framework was designed to provide a data-driven and customizable roadmap towards optimizing campus dining services and, by extension, the student experience.

  • school building with glowing circuit board patterns

    AI Is Coming to Schools — But Most School Buildings Still Run on Institutional Memory

    As school districts race to introduce AI into classrooms, administration, and curriculum planning, another conversation is happening behind the scenes: How prepared are school facilities themselves for the operational demands AI will create?

  • Rethinking K-12 Schools as a Continuous Learning Experience

    Most students move through three or more separate facilities during their K-12 journey, yet the built environments they encounter at each stage have traditionally been designed in isolation, with little continuity in spatial language, learning philosophy, or physical resources. Each new school is a reset with different layouts, learning models, expectations, and ways of moving through a building. The next generation of school design is making the case that the first day of kindergarten and the last day of high school can and should feel connected through common support systems and infrastructure in the physical environment.

  • Minnesota District Converts Middle School into Community Hub

    White Bear Lake Area Schools in White Bear Lake, Minn., recently announced the end of a major renovation project that converted a former middle school into a new centralized district and community hub, according to a news release.