Problem Solved?

In my library is a copy of an old book, Planning Schools for Tomorrow: The Issues Involved. If I removed the reference to the year (which was 1942), you would think it was written yesterday. When is the last time you heard someone say, “Nothing seems more certain than the fact that the good old days are gone,” or that they were “worried about budget deficits caused by a sagging economy”? The issues they faced in 1942 were not so different than the issues we face today.

The same is true of their goals: “1) A full program of education adapted to the capacities and interests of all the individuals whom the schools should serve. 2) Carefully selected teachers, supervisors, administrators and specialists such as nurses, physicians, dentists, psychiatrists, librarians, etc., who are competent, well-prepared, and interested in the development of community life. 3) Safe and sanitary school buildings, adapted to the education experiences and services to be offered, and adequate grounds and suitable equipment and instructional materials. 4) An effective State and local organization, coordinated with other State and local educational and social agencies, which make possible the efficient offering of needed educational services. Advisory service from the Federal Government should be available. 5) Adequate and joint support by the local, State and Federal Governments.”

When it came to facilities, the conversation was about accessibility; adequacy with respect to needed services; adequacy with respect to size; arrangement; utilization; possibility of rearrangement; and the possibility of expansion — conversations we are still having nearly 75 years later.

Adequate funding for education was — and still is — a concern. During the year that ended June 30, 1940, the U.S. spent approximately $2.7 billion for public elementary, secondary and higher education. The book says, “To offer the education program needed in this country would require a minimum expenditure of approximately 5 billion dollars a year for regular current expenses. An additional 5 billion dollars, at least, is needed for the repair of old, and the construction of new, school buildings.” The concern remains the same, but the dollars needed and being spent have increased.

The projected expenditures for higher education total more than $499 billion; and according to the CP&M research on campus construction, more than $11.6 billion in construction was completed in 2015 (see page 18 for details). While increased funding may have improved some things, we still have a long way to go. Seventy-five years later and the issues still remain the same!

This article originally appeared in the issue of .

Featured

  • Pitzer College

    Designing for Change in Higher Ed Learning Environments

    Higher education will continue to evolve, and learning environments must evolve with it. By prioritizing adaptable infrastructure, thoughtful reuse, strong energy performance, and wellness-centered design, campuses can create spaces that support learning today while remaining flexible for the future.

  • Photo credit: Elkus Manfredi Architects

    University of Virginia Selects Design-Build Team for New Residential Complex

    The University of Virginia in Charlottesville, Va., recently announced that it has selected a design-build team for a new upper-class residential development on campus, according to a news release. Capstone Development Partners—in partnership with Elkus Manfredi Architects and the Hoar Construction/Hourigan construction team—will move forward with the three-building, 310,000-square-foot housing facility.

  • 144-Year-Old High-School Campus Debuts New Academic Facility

    San Diego High School (SDHS) in San Diego, Calif., recently held a ribbon-cutting ceremony for a new student services and classroom building; the project is part of a larger SDHS Whole Site Modernization project that began in 2022.

  • Little Grand Market

    Designing for Belonging: Why Student Wellness Starts with Space

    From walkable site planning to flexible interiors, intentional design choices play a critical role in how students experience comfort, connection, and community.