NASBE's State Education Standard Explores the 'Future of Schools'

Alexandria, Va. – The new issue of NASBE’s journal, The State Education Standard, is boldly themed “The Future of Schools.” It challenges state policymakers and others to imagine a range of possible futures in education and to ask the “what if” questions to shape policies that can help ensure students have the opportunities to enter their own futures with confidence.

The passage of the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) inspires many of the education futures presented in the issue. In his piece on teacher evaluation, Matthew Steinberg of the University of Pennsylvania’s Graduate School of Education outlines key questions policymakers and administrators will have to weigh as they build multiple-measures evaluations under ESSA. On school improvement, Policy Studies Associates’ Dan Aladjem argues there is no surefire recipe for success: States can draw on some guiding principles, but largely they must chart their own road to turning around low-performing schools—and draw maps for others.

Authors in this issue also touch on key aspects of the “well-rounded education” that ESSA describes. On standards, a “what if” question that most state boards of education can decide, Gene Bottoms and Kirsten Sundell of the Southern Regional Education Board discuss the onset of computer science standards and review five actions states can take to ensure successful implementation. Tufts University’s Kei Kawashima-Ginsberg explains what Florida and Illinois have done to ensure their students receive the kind of high-quality civics education that transcends the social studies classroom to promote civic engagement, and Educational Testing Service Research Scientists Samuel H. Rikoon, Meghan W. Brenneman, and Kevin T. Petway II make the case for focusing on social and emotional learning and how to assess it.

The issue also takes a peak at new education technologies and instruction. NASBE’s Amelia Vance explores the early promise of virtual reality learning, and iNACOL’s Maria Worthen describes how personalized learning can particularly benefit students with disabilities and improve outcomes. And in the NASBE interview, the College Board’s David Coleman talks about how disruptive innovations in education need not be technology driven but must aim to “disrupt the fabric of inequality in this country” and level the playing field for all students, regardless of background.

Read the full September 2016 issue of The State Education Standard.

Featured

  • Recent University of Pennsylvania Projects Receive LEED Certifications

    The University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, Penn., recently announced that three of its recent construction projects have earned LEED certifications, according to university news. The Vagelos Laboratory for Energy Science and Technology (VLEST) received a LEED Platinum certification, Amy Gutmann Hall a LEED Gold, and the OTT Center for Track and Field a LEED silver.

  • UNL Kiewit Hall

    Designing for Engineering Excellence: Integrating Sustainability and Wellness at UNLs Kiewit Hall

    Kiewit Hall at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln exemplifies how academic institutions can integrate sustainability and wellness into modern learning environments. With an integrated and collaborative team approach, Kiewit Hall addresses enhanced learning and creativity, physical health, and mental wellness, and fosters a sense of community through innovative design, operations, and policy solutions.

  • Missouri State University Debuts Construction Education Center

    Missouri State University in Springfield, Mo., recently opened a new 10,000-square-foot addition and renovation to support the School of Construction, Design, and Project Management, according to university news. The Construction Education Success Center, built onto the existing Kemper Hall, provides academic space for the school’s construction managers and cost $9.6 million.

  • Empowering People Through Smart, Sustainable Campuses

    Sustainability is facing increasing scrutiny, with some questioning its costs and priorities. Yet for universities, it remains an essential driver of resilience, operational efficiency and long-term competitiveness. At the same time, there is a growing recognition that sustainable transformation is not just about reducing energy consumption and emissions to comply with tightening regulations ‒ it’s about creating vibrant, comfortable environments where people can thrive, innovate and connect. For university leadership, this is a complex balancing act, with rising energy costs and limited budgets only adding to the challenge.

Digital Edition