Public Trust

Planning, designing, constructing and keeping a facility in acceptable condition are formidable tasks. For most, garnering the necessary support to fund these projects may be an even bigger task. The perceived failure of our current education system has made the public wary of supporting future investments in education. The tendency to dwell on the negative has resulted in questions being raised about leadership, responsibility and accountability — making it more difficult for institutions to gain the public’s trust and needed financial support.

To regain that trust and support we can provide data gathered by our planning and evaluation processes; data that can help manage risk and prove need. On the facilities side, this includes the development of comprehensive facility master plans, capital improvement plans, post-occupancy evaluations and the use of facility condition indexes to help determine relative condition and prioritize need.

Often, the first challenge faced is convincing leadership that resources should be spent on a comprehensive planning process. Today’s educational institutions are serving a much broader population. They are becoming community centers, and facilities for early childhood programs, job training/retraining and workforce development. Local citizens should have a voice in the type of educational facilities planned for their communities. This collective vision will result in a facility that represents the needs of and is the collective responsibility of the community; and is supported by all of the people who helped create it.

It is also important to understand that the job is not done when a new building opens. Then comes the need for post-occupancy evaluations, facility condition assessments and the development of a capital improvement plan. Post-occupancy evaluations can reveal limitations in the current design and prevent costly mistakes in the future.

The recent recession wreaked havoc on education funding. Jobs were lost, the construction of new facilities decreased, maintenance of existing facilities was deferred. Unfortunately, facility systems can only last so long. The trend has shifted from building new to taking care of what we have, reducing deferred maintenance and prioritizing projects.

To regain financial support for education we first need to regain the public’s trust. Community involvement in the planning process and defensible data are needed to support and frame the messages we send — messages that must be sent by educational leaders who display competence, exhibit integrity and are true to their word.

This article originally appeared in the issue of .

Featured

  • Creating a First and Lasting Impression with Thoughtful, Sustainable Design

    Clemson University’s Nieri Family Alumni and Visitors Center serves as the new front door to campus, anchoring the Tiger experience through each step in the student journey.

  • New Jersey PreK–12 School Breaks Ground on New STEM Building

    Saddle River Day School (SRDS) in Saddle River, N.J., recently announced that it has broken ground on the new Dr. Kristen Walsh Hall of Science & Entrepreneurship, according to a news release. The school partnered with DIGroup Architecture for the design of the new facility, which will provide the school with space to expand its STEM and business education classes.

  • K12 Tutoring Earns Every Student Succeeds Act Level II Validation

    Personalized online tutoring service K12 Tutoring recently announced that it has received Level II validation underneath the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), according to a news release. The independently validated study provides evidence of K12 Tutoring’s role in creating positive student outcomes through effective academic intervention and research-based solutions.

  • Pangram Secures Funding for AI Detection Technology

    Pangram, which provides technology that detects AI-generated text, recently announced that it has secured nearly $4 million in pre-seed and seed funding, according to a news release. The most recent round of investments, totaling $2.7 million, come on top of the pre-existing seed fund of $1.25 million.

Digital Edition