Changing Times

People have said it before…education is a continuous process, a process that must change as we do. For students to learn, they need to process information in a way that relates to them. For us to better understand the present and forecast the future, it’s helpful to understand the social factors that shaped the systems of the past.

Agriculture — Prior to the First World War, farmers composed the largest single group in the country. Education was informal, taking place anytime, anywhere. Family provided many of the necessary skills and knowledge. The more advanced skills were learned through apprenticeships. The facilities where learning took place included the home, the church and the one-room schoolhouse. The learning environment was multi-age and multi-disciplinary, with formal education being reserved for the elite.

Industry — As the population shifted from rural to urban, education became institutional. As the family dispersed, social institutions grew and the factory model for schools was born. School buildings mirrored the factory — central corridors, symmetrical classroom wings, egg-crate design. Education reflected the values of the time — conformity, compliance, centralization, standardization. The goal of education was to “finish”.

Knowledge — The “Industrial Age,” born with the steam engine, died with the silicon chip. Unlike the smooth transition of the farmer to a factory job, most factory workers did not possess the qualifications to thrive in this new information-driven age. Education and lifelong learning are at the core of the “knowledge age.” Rather than to finish school, the goal of learning became to acquire access to more knowledge well past the age of formal schooling. In the past, the definition of an educated person was based on their completion of a prescribed knowledge base. Now, an educated person will be someone who has learned how to learn, and continues learning throughout their lifetime.

Technology is an enabler of change for our current generation, allowing education to become customized, personalized, specialized and portable. Technology-enhanced classrooms promote interaction and collaboration. Access to the Internet, distance learning opportunities and BYOD have allowed learning to happen anytime-anywhere. Global competition, jobs and the economy have also been drivers for change, spurring programs in S.T.E.M/S.T.E.A.M., technical/career and adult education. But the real driver for change is the new generation of students. They have been comfortable with technology since an early age, interact on social media, prefer hands-on learning, are entrepreneurial and are the ones changing how change is made.

This article originally appeared in the issue of .

Featured

  • Indiana University Launches Capital Campus in D.C.

    Indiana University recently held a ribbon-cutting ceremony for the new IU Capital Campus in Washington, D.C., according to university news. The eight-story facility will provide a central hub for the university’s existing programs and business operations based in D.C., uniting them under one roof and providing the opportunity to expand.

  • Classical building columns display digital data streams

    The Campus Nervous System: Why Facilities Risk Is Now a Leadership Issue in Higher Education

    Facility performance now intersects with safety, compliance, on-campus experience, institutional reputation, and financial resilience. That places it firmly on the leadership agenda.

  • California High School Opens New Classroom Building for 7th-, 8th-Graders

    Santa Rosa City Schools in Santa Rosa, Calif., recently announced the completion of a new classroom building for Piner High School. As the campus transitions to a Junior/Senior High School, the facility will play home to the school’s new population of seventh- and eighth-grade students.

  • Designing for Every Mind

    Learning environments have the power to shape not just what students know, but who they become. When a school is designed with genuine empathy—for the full range of ways students think, sense, and engage with the world—it becomes more than a building. It becomes a catalyst for growth, confidence, and belonging. That is the animating idea behind neurodiverse design, and it is one that is transforming how more architects and designers are thinking about school design.