New National Education Poll: Voters Overwhelmingly Oppose Closing Schools Based on High-Stakes, Standardized Testing

Washington, D.C. — A new national survey of likely general election voters finds overwhelming opposition to closing local schools based primarily on the results of high-stakes, standardized test scores. Additionally, voters believe that all public schools, whether charter schools or traditional brick and mortar schools, should be held to the same accountability and closure standards. The nationwide survey was conducted by McLaughlin & Associates in November and analyzes voter attitudes about standardized testing and school closure.

“Republicans and Democrats are united in their agreement that public schools should not be closed based primarily on standardized test scores,” said Stuart Polk, vice-president at McLaughlin & Associates. “Voters don’t consider standardized tests the best method to measure school and student performance. They want school evaluation systems that focus more on individual student measurements instead of aggregated standardized test scores for the entire school.”

According to a November 18-21, 2016 McLaughlin & Associates poll:

  • Overwhelmingly, 78% of voters oppose closing public schools based primarily on standardized test scores
  • Just 16% of voters consider standardized test scores to be a good measure of school quality, while 14% consider it a good indicator of student success
  • 73% of voters favor evaluation systems that measure how well a school helps individual students improve year to year, versus average standardized test scores
  • By a nearly 3 to 1 ratio, voters favor evaluating schools using a dashboard-like system which uses multiple measurements to assess quality and performance versus a single A to F letter grade
  • Only 3% think closing low performing schools is the most important education issue
  • 91% believe a formal public hearing should be required before a school closes so parents can discuss the impact; 61% strongly agree
  • 86% believe all public schools, whether charter or traditional brick and mortars, should be held to the same accountability and closure standards
  • 86% believe students should not be forced to leave their school just because other students are under-performing
  • 83% to 11%, voters prefer to keep struggling schools open to help them improve versus closing them

As the Trump administration considers education policy and state legislatures convene in January, this survey highlights for policy makers and elected officials the need for student-centered accountability systems – rather than over reliance on aggregated standardized test scores – to measure school and student success. Visit www.publicschooloptions.org to read the entire survey results.

Featured

  • Spaces4Learning Launches 2026 Facilities and Construction Brief Survey

    Spaces4Learning recently launched the 2026 Facilities and Construction Brief Survey, which collects data on the previous year’s K–12 and higher education construction projects nationwide.

  • Q&A: How to Prevent Kitchen Grease Fires in Commercial Kitchens

    School cafeterias and university dining halls serve thousands of meals daily, relying on high-heat equipment like fryers, grills, and ovens. While these operations keep students fed, they also generate significant grease-laden vapors. Without proper controls, this grease becomes a silent fire threat. As a certified exhaust cleaning specialist and business coach who has helped hundreds of institutional facilities achieve NFPA 96 compliance, I emphasize that proactive grease management isn’t optional; it’s a core fire/life safety practice.

  • Dallas ISD Voters Approve $6.2B Bond Package

    Dallas ISD voters have approved a record-setting $6.2-billion bond package that district leaders say will modernize aging campuses, eliminate portable classrooms and reshape learning environments across one of the nation’s largest school systems.

  • Opportunity by Design Framework

    Opportunity by Design

    Educational improvement efforts often focus on curriculum, instruction, assessment, professional development, and intervention systems while treating the physical school building as background. But school design is not a passive backdrop to learning — it is a structural lever for equity.