Bundling Auxiliary Services
How do we do better with what we have? Here is a new approach to the organization of service lines to consider.
Photo © alphaspirit
Colleges and universities are growing accustomed to hearing the prognosis: the financially unsustainable business
model, declining state funding, increasing competition for a
shrinking population of college-aged students... you know the
list. But there is simultaneously so much to feel encouraged by —
indeed many schools are thriving, new populations are gaining
access to education and so much more. Plus there is always the
opportunity to better deliver on your institution’s mission. As administrators
and their budgets get stretched, creativity and determination
prevail. This article recognizes that important idea, and
looks at an operating model that can not only increase operational
efficiencies, but also make a school more effective.
The Concept
The new idea here is realizing synergies between service units
as a way to better deliver on the institution’s mission, and as a way
to maximize these services’ financial and non-financial value to the
school. This concept can be applied throughout the whole enterprise.
The Opportunity
If the purpose of departments is to provide services essential
to the academic and administrative success of the institution
and its students, then the purpose of realizing synergies among
services is to align and maximize the institutional value of assets
through innovative solutions.
As an example, consider auxiliary services. Units here might be
dining, housing, security, conference services, parking, the bookstore,
the golf course, storage, etc. The concept discussed in this
article looks at the impact of realizing synergies among these services,
with the assertion that institutions that reflect on, acknowledge,
foster and rethink their approaches in response to surfaced
synergies can reap a long list of benefits. Such benefits include:
1. More effective operating expenses. It’s not about what you
spend, but what you spend it on. Allocating resources in response
to impact ensures that operating expenses are strategic.
2. More effective allocation of human capital. Person A works
on Project A over here, while Person B works on Project B
over there. Projects A and B are in fact quite related, and if
we could just get Persons A and B in a room together, they
would have the opportunity to collaborate for a greater impact,
at perhaps a lower cost of intellectual capital.
3. Streamlined idea generation and approvals process. How do
you effectively put people together to think on topics that
share a common goal? How might an improved feedback
process increase the likelihood and speed of approval?
How Does This Actually Look?
Realizing synergies between service units must begin with the
biggest question there is for an institution in higher education: What
are we trying to accomplish with our assets, and are our resources
allocated in a way that best enables us to fulfill our mission? Answering
this question is critical for everything that follows; depending on
the answer, a strategy can emerge as related to service units.
Some schools will be able to do this on their own. Some will
need advisors. And some might find benefit from identifying one or
more private-sector partners to help them achieve their new vision.
New Mexico State University (NMSU) is a prime example, as
it continues its investigation of what value — both financial and
non-financial — might result from establishing a public-private
partnership that spans a critical mass of its auxiliary assets (e.g.,
student housing, conference services, foodservice, special events,
etc.) when compared to the traditional delivery model.
Why Consider Partnering?
Unleashing value across multiple units can, but absolutely
does not necessitate outsourcing through a private partner; it is simply one of many strategies that should be evaluated for
its potential to provide efficiency and improve effectiveness. For
schools that don’t possess the resources to unleash maximum
value on their own, partnering might be useful.
Partners whose values and practices align with those of the
institution can bring benefits like funding outside of traditional
avenues, risk mitigation, operational expertise, technology,
agility, new revenue generation opportunities and cost savings.
The results can be impactful — creating economies of scale,
increasing efficient business practices, delivering
better services to students and generating resources
for reinvestment in student success initiatives. And
again, all in the service of better delivering on the
institutional mission.
Doing It Right
Any school considering engaging with the private
sector to realize synergies between service units
must be very careful to select the right partner.
Otherwise the benefits don’t outweigh the downsides.
This means the core value of mission alignment
must be understood, if not shared by, the private
sector partner. Once that is satisfied, schools
need to think about how to select a partner willing
to invest in understanding the political, market and
strategic forces that drive decision making. Based
on our experience, successful partners will demonstrate
these five attributes:
- The right partner with the right business model.
- Demonstrated knowledge and experience to not
only reduce operational costs and enhance services
to campus stakeholders but also to meet current
and future college or university challenges.
- Aligned values and desired outcomes with the
school in operating philosophy and organizational
culture so constituents cannot tell the difference between
the third party and the college or university.
- Demonstrated agility and scalability to respond
to increases and changes in demand for services
as the school evolves.
- Commitment to employing college or university
staff for a specified period and providing formalized
and regular training, upward mobility
opportunities, equal or better benefits and the
option to stay employed by the school.
Again, a partner isn’t a necessity, just one strategy.
Should My School Explore
Realizing Synergies Among
Service Units?
The reality is that what we’re talking about here
won’t be the answer for all schools. It won’t even
be the answer for most. But where it is the answer,
schools will be able to position themselves for long-term success
and mission delivery.
This article originally appeared in the January/February 2020 issue of Spaces4Learning.
About the Author
James Vigil ([email protected]) is a former CFO and vice president for Administration in higher education and is currently a senior associate at Brailsford and Dunlavey (www.bdconnect.com), a management and development advisory services firm.