Large, High-Poverty Schools Most Likely to Expel, Suspend Students

Disciplinary actions, such as expulsions and out-of-school suspensions, are common practices in schools across the cxountry. Little is known, though, about what types of schools are more likely to use these actions to deal with students’ problem behaviors and what prompts these actions to be taken. A new national study by a University of Missouri-Columbia researcher found that large, high-poverty middle and high schools are most likely to take disciplinary action. Also, the main reasons for such actions were fighting and insubordination rather than weapon-related problems.


“Policymakers and administrators need to take these findings seriously and consider how to develop fair policies and practices to prevent students’ problem behaviors and to create safe school environments,” says Motoko Akiba, assistant professor of Educational Leadership and Policy Analysis.


Akiba examined data from the School Survey on Crime and Safety, which was collected by the National Center for Educational Statistics during the 2000-01 school year. Her study specifically looked at 2,270 schools across the country and examined the prevalence of severe disciplinary action, the reasons for the action and whether the rates of the action differed by school size, poverty level, percentage of minority students or school level.


Akiba found that, on average, schools took severe disciplinary actions 14 times a year. The major reasons for these actions were physical attacks or fights (29 percent) and insubordination (22 percent), followed by threats and intimidation (11 percent). Fewer than one percent of these actions were taken due to students’ use of firearms and only about four percent were due to students’ use of other weapons.


The results also showed that large, more ethnically diverse, secondary and middle, and urban schools took severe disciplinary actions more frequently as a result of problem behaviors. Elementary and combined (K-12) schools, and suburban and rural schools took action on fewer occasions. When the schools with the same level of school disorder were compared, large, high-poverty middle and high schools had the highest rates of expulsion and out-of-school suspension.


Akiba says that since Congress passed the Gun-Free School Act in 2000, which required schools to adopt a zero-tolerance policy against guns on campus or face a loss of federal funding, severe disciplinary actions have become more prevalent in U.S. schools. According to statistics released by the U.S. Department of Education in 2003, 3,657 students were expelled for bringing a firearm to school during the 2000-01 school year.


Featured

  • College of the Desert Hits Construction Milestone on New Campus

    College of the Desert recently announced that the construction of its new Palm Springs Campus in Palm Springs, Calif., recently reached a major construction milestone, according to a news release. The college is partnering with general contractor C.W. Driver Companies, which recently “topped out” the facility by placing the final beam in its structure.

  • How a Portable Sink Helped an Art Classroom Run More Smoothly

    Classroom design decisions can have outsized effects on instructional time and safety at schools juggling mismatched infrastructure, strict budgets, and crowded schedules — particularly in the arts. Between spilled paint and dirty brushes, art classes run smoother with a sink in the studio. But many schools don’t have a sink in every art classroom.

  • Deferred Maintenance Issues Growing at Universities, Gordian Reports

    U.S. colleges and universities are falling increasingly behind on facilities maintenance and repair, according to Gordian’s 13th annual State of Facilities in Higher Education report. The deferred capital renewal burden has reached $156 per gross square foot, an 8% increase over the previous year.

  • Classical building columns display digital data streams

    The Campus Nervous System: Why Facilities Risk Is Now a Leadership Issue in Higher Education

    Facility performance now intersects with safety, compliance, on-campus experience, institutional reputation, and financial resilience. That places it firmly on the leadership agenda.