20% Time

Sit down with any parent and ask them to tell you about their child. You will not hear them brag that their child is exactly the same as their neighbor’s child. You will hear about their child’s interests, the things that excite them, what makes their child unique. To a parent talking about their child, being unique means “being different in a good way.” If uniqueness is a quality that we admire, why then do our schools try to fit all students into the same mold?

“Restructuring Education Pedagogy: A Model for Deep Change,” a report from the Media Laboratory, at MIT, summarized the issue this way..., “Current educational philosophy tends to focus on the means to provide ‘information’ to the masses. This leads to standardized tests that draw out this ‘information’ and those who can extract it are judged to be ‘educated’ or ‘intelligent’ — but this is not intelligence, nor does it assess a person’s knowledge, which is a person’s ability to organize and appropriately apply information. This approach/belief merely develops a generation of people who will make great game-show contestants but does little to provide future adult citizens with needed problem-solving skills. It develops rule-based learners in an era that needs model-based reasoners and systems thinkers.”

So, how can we improve education and reinvigorate our students? We can take a deeper look at what is known as 20% Time. This model, made popular by Google, gives employees one-fifth of their time to work on projects of their own choosing — empowering employees, spurring creativity, innovation and ideas. This is a model that can be applied in our schools. A.J. Juliani, a tech staff developer and education author writes that “what 20% Time allows students to do is pick their own project and learning outcomes, while still hitting all the standards and skills for their grade level. In fact, these students often go ‘above and beyond’ their standards by reaching for a greater depth of knowledge than most curriculum tends to allow.”

Instead of talking about standardization and what makes everyone the same, like our parents, it’s time to be talking about what makes us unique. Allow students to explore what they are passionate about. Encourage innovation and creativity. School can become more interesting and engaging for each and every student.

This article originally appeared in the School Planning & Management July 2013 issue of Spaces4Learning.

Featured

  • Anderson Brulé Architects Rebrands as ABA Studios

    Anderson Brulé Architects, based in San Jose, Calif., recently announced that it is celebrating 40 years of service by rebranding under a new name, according to a news release. The architectural, interior design, and planning firm will now be known as ABA Studios to refresh its identity underneath a new generation of leadership.

  • Longwood University Selects Builder for $73M Performing Arts Center

    Longwood University in Farmville, Va., recently announced that it has selected Swedish construction company Skanska as the builder of its new performing arts center, according to online news. The project involves the demolition of the current building and constructing a new, 64,500-square-foot facility.

  • Empowering People Through Smart, Sustainable Campuses

    Sustainability is facing increasing scrutiny, with some questioning its costs and priorities. Yet for universities, it remains an essential driver of resilience, operational efficiency and long-term competitiveness. At the same time, there is a growing recognition that sustainable transformation is not just about reducing energy consumption and emissions to comply with tightening regulations ‒ it’s about creating vibrant, comfortable environments where people can thrive, innovate and connect. For university leadership, this is a complex balancing act, with rising energy costs and limited budgets only adding to the challenge.

  • Image credit: O

    Strategic Campus Assessment: Moving Beyond Reactive Maintenance in Educational Facilities

    While campuses may appear stable on the surface, building systems naturally evolve over time, and proactive assessment can identify developing issues before they become expensive emergencies. The question isn't whether aging educational facilities need attention. It's how institutions can transition from costly reactive maintenance to strategic asset management in a way that protects both budgets and communities.

Digital Edition