Dance Floors vs. Sports Floors

The athlete stutter steps and dribbles from baseline to baseline usually protected by cushioned footwear. The dancer jumps and turns from stage right to stage left often barefoot or wearing soft dance shoes. The movements and performers are different, shouldn’t the floors be different too?

While it might seem logical that a well-designed sports floor will suit the needs of elite, athletic dancers there are several factors that should be considered when specifying a dance floor.

Construction of a sprung subfloor for a sports floor is typically firm with a high degree of energy return, ideal for ball bounce and athletes wearing cushioned footwear — a luxury barred to most dancers. Dancers prefer a sprung subfloor with a combination of shock absorption and energy return that will ease pressure on their joints and cushion landings.

After deciding on a subfloor, the next thing to consider is performance surface. Here the top priority for dancers is slip resistance to protect against slips and falls. Although athletes share those same risks, they need a surface that doesn’t block movements and are again usually protected by footwear.

To ensure you select the correct floor for your school, start by answering the following questions: What types of dance will primarily be performed? Will the floor be in a multipurpose or theatre facility? Is the subfloor — concrete, wood, sprung? Is the floor to be permanent or portable? Are the ceilings high enough?

Dancers spend significant hours practicing and performing, whether in a studio or on stage, that is their classroom. Choosing the right floor for your dance or performing arts program will instill confidence, creativity and protection for all students.

This article originally appeared in the issue of .

About the Author

Christine Ott is marketing director for Harlequin Floors.

Featured

  • Embry-Riddle Completes Construction on Research, Lab Facility

    Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (ERAU) in Daytona Beach, Fla., recently announced the end of construction on a new research and lab facility on campus. The Center for Aerospace Engineering II (CAT II) will support aerospace research and technology development and broke ground last summer.

  • Designing the Bridge Between Inclusivity and Independence in K–12 Schools

    Fostering independence is fundamental to learning and development for K–12 students. It offers many proven benefits, such as enhanced confidence, problem-solving, decision-making, and social skills. However, this foundational objective loses its impact if it’s not accessible and adaptable to all students. Inclusivity plays a critical role in cultivating independence and healthy autonomy for students, fostering positive student learning outcomes by uniting pedagogy with the physical learning environment.

  • Year-Round Schools Require Year-Round Indoor Air Quality Planning

    While many schools are out for the summer, year-round schools follow a more “balanced” schedule with shorter, more frequent breaks spaced throughout the school year. Even though this offers educational benefits, these facilities have less downtime for building maintenance. This can become an issue when facilities managers overlook the importance of routine HVAC maintenance and air duct cleaning services.

  • Planning with Clarity: Using AI to Make Better Campus Decisions, Not Just Better Designs

    Higher education leaders are being asked to make increasingly high-stakes decisions about campus facilities amid greater uncertainty than ever before. Social and economic pressures, shifting enrollment, and evolving learning models compete with growing deferred maintenance needs to strain even the most robust infrastructure budgets.