Changing Times

Education is a continuous process, a process that must change as we do. For students to learn, they need to process information in a way that relates to them. Looking back, we can see that education has changed to match the times. G.K. Chesterton said, “Education is simply the soul of a society as it passes from one generation to another.” For us to better understand the present and forecast the future, it’s helpful to understand the social factors that shaped the systems of the past.

Agriculture — Prior to the First World War, farmers composed the largest single group in the U.S. For the most part, education was informal, taking place anytime, anywhere. The facilities where learning took place included the home, the church and the one-room schoolhouse. More advanced skills were learned through apprenticeships. The learning environment was multi-age and multidisciplinary, with formal education being reserved for the elite.

Industry — As the population shifted from rural to urban, education became institutional. The transition from agriculture to industry was seen as a period of hope and opportunity. Social institutions grew and the factory model for schools was born. School buildings mirrored the factory — central corridors, symmetrical classroom wings, eggcrate design. Education reflected the values of the time — conformity, compliance, centralization, standardization. The goal of education was to “finish” school in preparation of entering the workforce.

Knowledge — The Industrial Age, born with the steam engine, died with the silicon chip. Most factory workers did not possess the qualifications to thrive in this new information-driven age. Education and lifelong learning are at the core of the “knowledge age.” Rather than to “finish” school, the goal of learning became to acquire access to more knowledge well past the age of formal schooling. Today an “educated” person will be someone who has learned how to learn, and continues learning throughout his or her lifetime.

Technology is an enabler of change, allowing education to become customized, personalized, specialized and portable. Access to the Internet, distance-learning opportunities and BYOD allow learning to happen anytime, anywhere. Global competition, jobs and the economy have also been drivers for change, spurring programs in STEM/STEAM, technical/career and adult education. But the real driver for change is the new generation of students. They have been comfortable with technology since an early age, interact on social media, prefer hands-on learning, are entrepreneurial and are the ones changing how change is made.

This article originally appeared in the issue of .

Featured

  • CU-Lock Haven Receives $1.75M Gift for New Entrepreneurship, Media Center

    Commonwealth University-Lock Haven in Lock Haven, Penn., recently received a $1.75-million donation from entrepreneur and alumnus Nicholas Subich ’17, according to a university news release. The funds will go toward establishing the Nicholas Subich Center for Entrepreneurship and Media, a technology-driven hub for innovation and experiential learning.

  • UT-San Antonio Begins Residence Hall Renovations

    The University of Texas at San Antonio recently began a $6-million renovation project to one of its residence halls, according to a news release. Originally completed in 1986, Chisolm Hall measures in at 120,860 square feet and is the oldest and largest residence hall on campus.

  • Cal Poly Humboldt Starts Construction on Healthcare Education Hub

    California State Polytechnic University, Humboldt in Arcata, Calif., recently announced that work has begun on a renovation project that will turn the Stewart Building into a new Healthcare Education Hub, according to a news release. The university is partnering with Sundt Construction Inc. for construction services.

  • How Proactive Maintenance Can Transform Athletic Facilities into Strategic Assets for College Sports

    College athletics is entering one of the most transformative periods in its history. With NIL reshaping financial models and competitive expectations, athletic departments across the country are being asked to do more than ever with increasingly constrained resources.