New Report Provides Education Leaders with School Interventions That Work

Washington, D.C. – As state, district, and school leaders begin work under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) to identify and intervene in low-performing schools and among under-achieving groups of students, a new report released today by the Alliance for Excellent Education offers action steps and research-backed solutions to guide their work.

“We want doctors to treat more than just symptoms; to cure an illness, they have to treat the cause,” said Bob Wise, president of the Alliance for Excellent Education. “Similarly, education leaders should not tackle issues of underperformance, such as low math or reading scores, without knowing the root causes, which could include poor instruction, poor curriculum, or even chronic absenteeism.”

Under the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), states and districts chose from a handful of school interventions approved by the U.S. Department of Education. ESSA, which replaced NCLB, grants states and districts much more flexibility, stipulating that states must identify schools for improvement based on the performance of all students as well as individual groups of students, but it largely leaves the type of intervention up to schools and districts.

“The nation’s main education law has changed, but state, district, and school leaders must still act to improve low-performing schools and students,” said Wise. “The main difference is that the law no longer dictates how they should do so. This report outlines key factors that help education leaders make good decisions.”

The report, School Interventions That Work: Targeted Support for Low-Performing Students, breaks out key steps in the identification and improvement process, focusing on (1) a diagnosis of school needs; (2) a plan to improve schools; and (3) evidenced-based interventions that work.

The diagnosis of school needs, known as a school needs assessment, contains four key elements:

  1. An organized display of data that combines students’ academic performance with school climate indicators
  2. An understanding of what’s going on inside the numbers—provided by additional descriptors such as diagnostic, formative, and interim assessment data
  3. A theory of action for data collection around what teachers are teaching and how effectively they are teaching it
  4. An analysis of adult actions and student results that represents the school’s best effort to link specific adult behaviors to specific problematic student academic outcomes.

When a needs assessment is done effectively, school districts, with possible assistance from states, can match research-based interventions to a low-performing school’s most critical challenges. Action steps for districts to take include reviewing literature to find relevant, research-based strategies to address the weaknesses that showed up in the data and examining how similar states or districts implemented solutions to tackle similar challenges.

The report also offers resources for evidence-based solutions such as the Best Evidence Encyclopedia’s “Evidence for ESSA” tool and the U.S. Department of Education’s What Works Clearinghouse. It lists a series of studies showing robust, multi-year demonstrations of successful interventions for English language learners and students with disabilities.

In the interest of acting quickly, education leaders may be tempted to adopt a school improvement plan (SIP) without undertaking needs assessments, but the report advises against it.

“Without an exacting, detailed self-assessment, a check by an external visiting team, and the careful matching of strongly researched interventions to the specific identified needs of schools, SIPs will capture best intentions but will fail to improve student learning,” the report warns.

“ESSA gives education leaders the freedom to develop the interventions that work best in their schools,” said Wise. “Now is the time for schools, districts, and states to work together to bring the most effective assistance possible to those who are, every day, trying to make a difference for students who need it the most.”

School Interventions That Work is available here. It was released in conjunction with a U.S. House Committee on Education and the Workforce hearing on state and local reform efforts under ESSA that featured testimony from Phillip Lovell, the Alliance’s vice president of policy development and government relations.

Featured

  • Spaces4Learning Trends & Predictions for Educational Facilities in 2026: Part I

    We asked, you answered, and the results are in! Last year, we put out a call for submissions to collect our readership’s opinion on trends and predictions for K–12 and higher education facilities in 2026.

  • Texas State University Completes Stadium Renovations

    Texas State University in San Marcos, Texas, recently announced that it has completed a series of additions and renovations to its football stadium, according to a news release. Formerly known as the Bobcat Stadium End Zone Complex, the Johnny and Nathali Weisman Football Performance Center is an 85,000-square-foot expansion featuring hospitality spaces, banquet spaces, exterior concourses, and upgrades to the field house.

  • University of Kentucky Receives $150M Gift Toward New Arts District

    The University of Kentucky’s Board of Trustees recently received a $150-million gift from The Bill Gatton Foundation, according to a university news release, to build a new arts district on the campus in Lexington, Ky. The new district will feature a new College of Fine Arts building and a multi-hundred-seat theater, among other amenities.

  • Stanford Completes Construction on Graduate School of Education Facility

    Stanford University in Stanford, Calif., recently announced the end of construction on a new home for its Graduate School of Education, according to a news release. The university partnered with McCarthy Building Companies on the 160,000-square-foot project, which involved two major renovations and one new construction effort.