Analysis Paralysis

I am involved in the unenviable process of shopping for a new mattress. I last bought one in 2003, which means my current bed has outlasted its recommended seven- to 10-year lifespan. A lot has changed in mattresses in the past 15 years, including the variety and combination of materials available, the advent of adjustable (and massaging) bases, the ability to shop and order online and, of course, prices. Fifteen years ago, I spent about $300 for a mattress and box springs, delivery, and removal of the old set. Today I’m looking at a bare minimum of $800 and could easily spend several thousand dollars to replace my existing set.

I’m stuck in what’s called “analysis paralysis.” A purchasing decision needs to be made, but there are so many options offered—as well as opinions on both products and vendors—that I am overthinking the purchase and fear making the wrong choice. After all, I’m going to live with the results for at least the next decade. I don’t want to be less than 100 percent satisfied.

I imagine there are times when making purchasing decisions for a college or university—whether it is flooring for residence halls, projectors for a classroom building, lawncare equipment for the campus landscape, a roof for the library, or a new student center—also results in some degree of analysis paralysis. Sorting through the available options, deciding how much you want to spend and need to spend (conceivably two different amounts), evaluating and selecting vendors, all while realizing that you and your stakeholders, board, faculty, staff, and students will need to live with the results for the foreseeable future, must be daunting.

With this in mind, this issue of CP&M includes our annual Facilities Sourcebook, which is designed to serve as a year-round reference guide to services and products for the education market. The businesses that are featured in this special section are advertisers that regularly support this publication. They also support what you do; creating, furnishing, securing, and maintaining the facilities within which students learn. Without them, we would not exist. You are invited to take that into consideration when you make future decisions about purchasing materials and services. Hopefully their presence in CP&M will help with any analysis paralysis you may be experiencing in your goal to provide the best for campus.

This article originally appeared in the College Planning & Management July/August 2018 issue of Spaces4Learning.

Featured

  • New Arizona Fine Arts School Reaches Construction Milestone

    Construction of the new Hilltop School for the Arts and Theater in Litchfield Park, Ariz., recently hit a significant milestone, according to a news release. The Agua Fria High School District held a beam-signing ceremony to celebrate the building’s topping out, or the placement of its last structural beam.

  • How a Portable Sink Helped an Art Classroom Run More Smoothly

    Classroom design decisions can have outsized effects on instructional time and safety at schools juggling mismatched infrastructure, strict budgets, and crowded schedules — particularly in the arts. Between spilled paint and dirty brushes, art classes run smoother with a sink in the studio. But many schools don’t have a sink in every art classroom.

  • Colorado School District Breaks Ground on Unified PK–12 Campus

    The Haxtun School District No. Re-2J in Haxtun, Colo., recently announced that ground has been broken on a renovation/addition project that will unite its two schools, Haxtun Elementary and Haxtun Jr/Sr High School, according to a news release.

  • Deferred Maintenance Issues Growing at Universities, Gordian Reports

    U.S. colleges and universities are falling increasingly behind on facilities maintenance and repair, according to Gordian’s 13th annual State of Facilities in Higher Education report. The deferred capital renewal burden has reached $156 per gross square foot, an 8% increase over the previous year.