The Light Gets In

Who remembers “sick building syndrome?” In the 1970s, during the first energy crisis, steps were taken to reduce energy consumption in new facilities (as well as existing ones). Buildings were designed with smaller windows or windows that couldn’t open in order to minimize loss of heated or cooled air. There was also the theory that if students couldn’t see to the outside, they wouldn’t be distracted and would be more likely to focus on what was being presented to them in the classroom, improving outcomes.

This closing off of educational spaces didn’t have the effect it was predicted to have, at least not on student performance. It may have saved a few dollars on energy costs. Fast-forward to today, and facility design is opening up learning spaces to natural light, with expansive (albeit energy-efficient) windows and movable and glass walls that allow light to penetrate deep into the interior of facilities. Various studies show that classrooms with the most amount of daylighting are associated with better student performance and outcomes. Other studies have shown that students with a view of some green space outside a classroom window performed better on tests requiring focused attention, and also recovered better from stress.

Two of the feature articles in this issue of CP&M talk about letting the light in: “Trends 2020” (page 13) and “Science on Display” (page 31). It is mentioned in other content in this issue as well. While editing these articles and thinking about the benefits of natural light penetrating the buildings in which we learn, work, and live, the lyrics of Leonard Cohen’s song “Anthem” came to mind:

Ring the bells that still can ring
Forget your perfect offering
There is a crack, a crack in everything
That’s how the light gets in

Today’s campus administrators have a lot on their plates, from actual cracks in their campus facilities (see the article on deferred maintenance on page 24) to declining enrollments, a perceived public push-back on the value of higher education, shrinking funding, rising costs, and much more. Some naysayers are predicting the end of higher education as we’ve known it. That’s OK. Colleges and universities have always been on the leading edge of creativity and innovation, constantly reinventing themselves… and they will continue to do so. That’s how the light gets in.

This article originally appeared in the College Planning & Management July/August 2019 issue of Spaces4Learning.

Featured

  • Myrtle Grove Elementary

    Phased Construction Keeps Students on Campus During Rebuild

    When Escambia County School District needed to replace most of Myrtle Grove Elementary School in Pensacola, Fla., it had three distinct challenges: honor the school's legacy in the community, bring state-of-the-art learning environments to the county, and be seamlessly built on the same site as the active school campus.

  • Spaces4Learning Announces 2026 Product Award Winners

    Spaces4Learning has just announced the winners of the 2026 Product Awards! The award program spotlights outstanding product development achievements of manufacturers and suppliers whose products or services are considered to be particularly noteworthy in their ability to enhance K–12 and higher-education learning environments.

  • Can AI Help Build Stronger Communities in Student Housing?

    Student housing success is shifting from operational performance to student experience, with belonging now at the center. A recent 2025 report underscores a growing emphasis on student well-being, community, and engagement, signaling that expectations now extend beyond logistics to ensure students feel supported in their living environments. AI is enabling that shift by reducing administrative workload and giving teams more time to focus on meaningful student engagement.

  • Girl Sitting at Library Desk, Using Laptop

    How Campus Design Shapes the Finals Week Experience

    Academic performance is not just about preparation. It is closely tied to how students manage stress, maintain their energy, and shift between work and recovery modes. Much of that is influenced, directly or indirectly, by design.