Large, High-Poverty Schools Most Likely to Expel, Suspend Students

Disciplinary actions, such as expulsions and out-of-school suspensions, are common practices in schools across the cxountry. Little is known, though, about what types of schools are more likely to use these actions to deal with students’ problem behaviors and what prompts these actions to be taken. A new national study by a University of Missouri-Columbia researcher found that large, high-poverty middle and high schools are most likely to take disciplinary action. Also, the main reasons for such actions were fighting and insubordination rather than weapon-related problems.


“Policymakers and administrators need to take these findings seriously and consider how to develop fair policies and practices to prevent students’ problem behaviors and to create safe school environments,” says Motoko Akiba, assistant professor of Educational Leadership and Policy Analysis.


Akiba examined data from the School Survey on Crime and Safety, which was collected by the National Center for Educational Statistics during the 2000-01 school year. Her study specifically looked at 2,270 schools across the country and examined the prevalence of severe disciplinary action, the reasons for the action and whether the rates of the action differed by school size, poverty level, percentage of minority students or school level.


Akiba found that, on average, schools took severe disciplinary actions 14 times a year. The major reasons for these actions were physical attacks or fights (29 percent) and insubordination (22 percent), followed by threats and intimidation (11 percent). Fewer than one percent of these actions were taken due to students’ use of firearms and only about four percent were due to students’ use of other weapons.


The results also showed that large, more ethnically diverse, secondary and middle, and urban schools took severe disciplinary actions more frequently as a result of problem behaviors. Elementary and combined (K-12) schools, and suburban and rural schools took action on fewer occasions. When the schools with the same level of school disorder were compared, large, high-poverty middle and high schools had the highest rates of expulsion and out-of-school suspension.


Akiba says that since Congress passed the Gun-Free School Act in 2000, which required schools to adopt a zero-tolerance policy against guns on campus or face a loss of federal funding, severe disciplinary actions have become more prevalent in U.S. schools. According to statistics released by the U.S. Department of Education in 2003, 3,657 students were expelled for bringing a firearm to school during the 2000-01 school year.


Featured

  • DLR Group Appoints New K–12 Education Practice Leader

    Integrated design firm DLR Group recently announced that it has named its new global K–12 Education leader, Senior Principal Carmen Wyckoff, AIA, LEED AP, according to a news release. Her teams have members in all 36 of the firm’s offices in the U.S., Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Europe, and Asia.

  • Texas K–12 District to Build New Elementary, High Schools

    The High Island Independent School District on the Bolivar Peninsula in Southeast Texas recently announced that construction on a new elementary school and a new high school will begin in January 2026, according to local news. Funding will come from a $27.9-million bond passed in May 2025.

  • UCNJ Launches $30M Modernization of Physical Education Center

    The Union College of Union County (UCNJ) in Cranford, N.J., recently broke ground on a new $30-million modernization project for its Physical Education Center (PECK), according to a news release. The college partnered with DIGroup Architecture for the project’s design, transitioning the existing 42,000-square-foot structure into a campus hub for student athletics and campus life.

  • Empowering People Through Smart, Sustainable Campuses

    Sustainability is facing increasing scrutiny, with some questioning its costs and priorities. Yet for universities, it remains an essential driver of resilience, operational efficiency and long-term competitiveness. At the same time, there is a growing recognition that sustainable transformation is not just about reducing energy consumption and emissions to comply with tightening regulations ‒ it’s about creating vibrant, comfortable environments where people can thrive, innovate and connect. For university leadership, this is a complex balancing act, with rising energy costs and limited budgets only adding to the challenge.

Digital Edition