Be Prepared
- By Michelle P. Crockett
- 04/01/17
On Mar. 16, 2017, President Donald J. Trump released
his first budget proposal for 2018 entitled, America First:
A Budget Blueprint To Make America Great Again. (See www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget.) While it is important to note
that this blueprint is just a proposal, one that ultimately must be
approved by Congress, Trump has provided clear insight as to his
priorities and intentions with respect to public education, i.e., a
$9-billion or 13.5-percent reduction in funding to the U.S. Department
of Education. Thus, school districts across the country must
not only carefully monitor his budget proposal, but also prepare for
a likely reduction in federal aid that will inevitably affect programming
and educational opportunities in K-12 public schools.
In the introductory paragraphs to the blueprint, the president
indicates that the 2018 budget “…places power in the hands of
parents and families to choose schools that are better for their
children by investing an additional $1.4 billion in school choice
programs.” More specifically, the $1.4 billion increase to public
and private school choice increases the annual total to $20 billion;
includes a $168 million increase for charter schools; a $250 million
allotment for a new private school choice program; and a $1 billion
increase for Title I, “dedicated to encouraging districts to adopt
a system of student-based budgeting and open enrollment that
enables federal, state and local funding to follow the student to the
public school of his or her choice.”
Other proposed cuts include:
- $2.4 billion for the “Supporting Effective Instruction State
Grants Program” — a grant given to states to help prepare and
train teachers and school leaders;
- Elimination of the “21st-Century Community Learning Centers”
program — supports before and after-school programs and
summer school programs;
- Reduction in funding for the Federal TRIO and GEAR UP programs
— TRIO is comprised of eight programs targeted to serve
and assist low income K-12 students, first generation college students
and students with disabilities progress from middle school
to post baccalaureate. GEAR UP (acronym for Gaining Early
Awareness & Readiness for Undergraduate Programs) focuses on
increasing the number of middle and high school students who
are prepared to enter college; and
- Elimination or reduction of over 20 categorical programs that,
according to Trump, do not address national needs, duplicate other
programs, or are more appropriately supported by state, local or private
funds, including, but not limited to, Striving Readers, Teacher
Quality Partnership, and International Education programs.
Essentially, it appears that Trump would like to see federal and
state funding provided to public school districts follow students to
the public schools of their choice. Betsy De Vos, the newly appointed
Secretary of the U.S. Department of Education, shares Trump’s
views in this regard. According to the Department’s website: “…
De Vos has worked to support the creation of new educational
choices for students [and] firmly believes that neither the ZIP code
in which a child lives nor a child’s household income should be the
principal determinant of his or her opportunity to receive a world
class education …. Thus, as Secretary she will advocate for the returning
control of education to states and localities, giving parents
greater power to choose the educational settings that are best for
their children...” (See www.ed.gov/news/staff/bios/devos.html.)
Even though it is unclear as to the exact cuts public education
will endure in 2018, there seems to be no question that there will
be cuts. De Vos’s position on school of choice is no secret, and
thus, with the aid of decreased funding to public school districts,
“choice” may very well shape the new landscape of K-12 public
education. What will this mean for districts: shrinking student
population; increased demand for services; reduced funding to
meet demand; competing for school-aged children who reside in
certain districts but “choose” to be educated in private or charter
schools? Perhaps, all of the foregoing possibilities will come to
fruition if Trump’s proposed budget is adopted. But, no matter
what happens, school districts will still have to educate and service
the needs of children. The following are just a few suggestions as to
what districts can do as they formulate a strategic plan forward:
- Contact your Congressional representatives;
- Adopt conservative annual budgets;
- Work with corporate partners in your community and enlist
their support for educational programming and services that
may be cut or eliminated entirely; and
- Once a budget is adopted, work with your attorneys to understand
the rules.
This article originally appeared in the issue of .
About the Author
Michelle P. Crockett leads the hiring of all attorneys, recruitment, diversity and inclusion initiatives, mentoring programs, professional development and continuing education (CLE) initiatives at Miller Canfield. She also specializes in defending Fortune 500 companies and public-sector clients against a variety of employment-related claims and provides litigation and traditional labor advice and support to school districts throughout Michigan, which includes but is not limited to, assistance with special education issues, due process hearings, student discipline and collective bargaining.