Moving Forward

It has been a hectic few years for colleges and a near impossible task of planning for the future of higher education. College enrollments have soared. According to the National Center for Education Statistics, “In fall 2012, total undergraduate enrollment in degree-granting postsecondary institutions was 17.7 million students, an increase of 48 percent from 1990 when enrollment was 12.0 million students.” This was due in part to the growing importance of a college education, as well as the need for adult learners to brush up on their skills in order to improve their chances at landing a job in the recent economic downturn.

While economic conditions may have boosted enrollment, they played havoc on funding for higher education. As state support declined, tuitions and fees rose. As we pushed for increased access for students, the shifting burden from states to students made higher education unaffordable for many. As tuitions rose we experienced growth in the community college system, whose focus was on preparing students for transfer to four-year institutions, providing workforce development and skills training and offering noncredit programs. Recently, a number of pilot programs have been developed allowing community colleges to offer bachelor’s degrees in a limited number of fields.

For-profit institutions have also stepped in as an alternative. Many of these institutions serve students well, but others have brought about a barrage of negative publicity over deceptive marketing tactics, complying with federal-aid limits, higher student debt, lower graduation rates and poor preparation for the job market.

On July 22, 2014, President Barack Obama signed the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) into law. WIOA is designed to help jobseekers access employment, education, training and support services. This means that the focus will continue on career and technical education and will require increased efforts by institutions to encourage employer engagement and partnerships with businesses to ensure the success of these programs. We will continue to hear more about an emphasis on S.T.E.M. (and in some cases S.T.E.A.M., where the arts have been added to the mix).

Will it be S.T.E.M or S.T.E.A.M? Have we priced students out of the market? Will alternatives to traditional education continue to pop up? Are we preparing students for life after college or just to find their first job? Will enrollments continue to rise as unemployment rates drop? The big question is: How do institutions effectively plan for an uncertain and ever-changing future?

This article originally appeared in the issue of .

Featured

  • Campus Safety Requires Using Every Resource Available

    Across the U.S., school and campus leaders are facing a security landscape that has changed dramatically over the past decade. Incidents on school property have increased in recent years, with several consecutive years setting record totals. According to analysis of data by CNN, dozens of shootings now occur on school grounds annually across K-12 and higher education environments.

  • University of Kansas Breaks Ground on Entrepreneurship Hub

    The University of Kansas in Lawrence, Kan., recently held a groundbreaking ceremony for the new KU Entrepreneurship Hub, according to university news. The Hub is part of the university’s School of Business and will include spaces for experiential learning and programming.

  • Philadelphia Middle School Facility Earns LEED Gold Certification

    The Alternative Middle Years (AMY) at James Martin Middle School in Philadelphia, Penn., recently received a LEED Gold certification from the U.S. Green Building Council, according to a news release. The School District of Pennsylvania partnered with KSS Architects on the project.

  • Benson Polytechnic High School in Portland, OR

    Preserving Legacy, Designing for the Future

    As historic academic buildings age, institutions face a difficult decision: preserve and adapt or demolish and rebuild. How do we honor the legacy of these spaces while adapting them to meet the needs of modern learners?