Skip to main content
Add as a preferred source on Google

Debriefing Unsuccessful Bidders

  • 03/01/16

The manner in which the competitive bidding process is managed is probably the most significant factor in shaping how the supply base views an institution. So, for the preservation of your institution’s positive image, you should treat the competitive bidding process with care. One facet of the process that is of particular significance is the debriefing procedure.

Debriefing is simply the act of meeting with an unsuccessful bidder to explain why their bid was not deemed to be the most attractive. Debriefing is a fragile process. You want to be as helpful as possible to the unsuccessful bidder, but you also must maintain the confidentiality of other suppliers’ information. Here are guidelines for conducting debriefings:

  • State your debriefing goals in writing, both internally and to the bidder. Goals may include: identifying weaknesses in the bidder’s proposal, demonstrating that the bidder was treated fairly, promoting good relations within the business community, answering the bidder’s questions, and obtaining feedback from the bidder.
  • Provide helpful information. Helpful information includes: strengths of the bidder’s proposal, weaknesses of the bidder’s proposal, and the reasons for not accepting the bidder’s proposal.
  • Protect confidential information. This type of information includes the names and the ranking of other bidders, and the specifics of the other bidders’ proposals (such as price or the dollar amount or percentage difference between the winning proposal and the bidder’s proposal).

Well-done debriefings can reinforce a positive reputation for your institution. By following and expanding upon these guidelines, you can help your institution secure an identity of fairness, integrity and professionalism.

Source: Next Level Purchasing Association (www.nextlevelpurchasing.com)

This article originally appeared in the issue of .

Featured

  • Rethinking K-12 Schools as a Continuous Learning Experience

    Most students move through three or more separate facilities during their K-12 journey, yet the built environments they encounter at each stage have traditionally been designed in isolation, with little continuity in spatial language, learning philosophy, or physical resources. Each new school is a reset with different layouts, learning models, expectations, and ways of moving through a building. The next generation of school design is making the case that the first day of kindergarten and the last day of high school can and should feel connected through common support systems and infrastructure in the physical environment.

  • Spaces4Learning Announces 2026 Product Award Winners

    Spaces4Learning has just announced the winners of the 2026 Product Awards! The award program spotlights outstanding product development achievements of manufacturers and suppliers whose products or services are considered to be particularly noteworthy in their ability to enhance K–12 and higher-education learning environments.

  • Wold Completes Geothermal Projects at Two Minnesota Schools

    Wold Architects & Engineers recently announced that it has completed two geothermal expansion projects for Mounds View Public Schools in Shoreview, Minn., according to a news release. The work at Highview Middle School and Irondale High School serves the district’s long-term goal of reducing energy costs and dependency on non-renewable fuel sources, as well as improving building performance.

  • Cal Poly Humboldt Starts Construction on Healthcare Education Hub

    California State Polytechnic University, Humboldt in Arcata, Calif., recently announced that work has begun on a renovation project that will turn the Stewart Building into a new Healthcare Education Hub, according to a news release. The university is partnering with Sundt Construction Inc. for construction services.