Skip to main content
Add as a preferred source on Google

Debriefing Unsuccessful Bidders

  • 03/01/16

The manner in which the competitive bidding process is managed is probably the most significant factor in shaping how the supply base views an institution. So, for the preservation of your institution’s positive image, you should treat the competitive bidding process with care. One facet of the process that is of particular significance is the debriefing procedure.

Debriefing is simply the act of meeting with an unsuccessful bidder to explain why their bid was not deemed to be the most attractive. Debriefing is a fragile process. You want to be as helpful as possible to the unsuccessful bidder, but you also must maintain the confidentiality of other suppliers’ information. Here are guidelines for conducting debriefings:

  • State your debriefing goals in writing, both internally and to the bidder. Goals may include: identifying weaknesses in the bidder’s proposal, demonstrating that the bidder was treated fairly, promoting good relations within the business community, answering the bidder’s questions, and obtaining feedback from the bidder.
  • Provide helpful information. Helpful information includes: strengths of the bidder’s proposal, weaknesses of the bidder’s proposal, and the reasons for not accepting the bidder’s proposal.
  • Protect confidential information. This type of information includes the names and the ranking of other bidders, and the specifics of the other bidders’ proposals (such as price or the dollar amount or percentage difference between the winning proposal and the bidder’s proposal).

Well-done debriefings can reinforce a positive reputation for your institution. By following and expanding upon these guidelines, you can help your institution secure an identity of fairness, integrity and professionalism.

Source: Next Level Purchasing Association (www.nextlevelpurchasing.com)

This article originally appeared in the issue of .

Featured

  • Building Beyond Simulation: Creating Immersive Ecosystems for Healthcare Education

    Health sciences education is one of the fastest-growing facility types in colleges and universities. The demand for medical, nursing, and allied health professionals is driving the creation and renovation of medical simulation training facilities that provide students with real-world experience through advanced simulation-based learning.

  • How Proactive Maintenance Can Transform Athletic Facilities into Strategic Assets for College Sports

    College athletics is entering one of the most transformative periods in its history. With NIL reshaping financial models and competitive expectations, athletic departments across the country are being asked to do more than ever with increasingly constrained resources.

  • Rethinking K-12 Schools as a Continuous Learning Experience

    Most students move through three or more separate facilities during their K-12 journey, yet the built environments they encounter at each stage have traditionally been designed in isolation, with little continuity in spatial language, learning philosophy, or physical resources. Each new school is a reset with different layouts, learning models, expectations, and ways of moving through a building. The next generation of school design is making the case that the first day of kindergarten and the last day of high school can and should feel connected through common support systems and infrastructure in the physical environment.

  • Georgia State University Opens New Research Tower

    Georgia State University in Atlanta, Ga., recently held a ribbon-cutting ceremony for a new, nine-story, 155,000-square-foot Research Tower, according to university news. Amenities include academic classrooms, a large lecture space, teaching labs, faculty research space, and the uppermost floors reserved for future expansion.