Public Trust is Essential

Planning, designing, constructing and keeping a facility in acceptable condition are formidable tasks, but, garnering the necessary support to fund these projects may be an even bigger task. The perceived failure of our education system has made the public wary of supporting future investments. The tendency to dwell on the negative has made it more difficult for institutions to gain public trust and needed financial support.

To regain community trust and support, we need to provide data gathered by our planning and evaluation processes that verifies we are managing risk and provides evidence of need. This includes the development of comprehensive facility master plans, capital improvement plans, post-occupancy evaluations and the use of facility condition indexes.

Often, the first challenge is convincing leadership that time and money should be spent on a comprehensive planning process, and that effective planning includes the representation and involvement of the entire community. Today’s educational institutions are becoming centers of community, facilities for early childhood programs, job training/retraining and workplace development. In order to garner the necessary public support and enhance accountability, local citizens should have a voice in the type of their educational facilities. This collective vision will result in a facility that: represents the needs of the community; is the collective responsibility of the community; and is supported by all of the people who helped create it.

It is also important that everyone understand that opening a new building is only the beginning. Next comes the need for post-occupancy evaluations, facility condition assessments and the development of a capital improvement plan. In my opinion, too few institutions perform post-occupancy evaluations. There is a lot we can learn from our buildings, and performing a post-occupancy evaluation can reveal limitations in the current design and prevent costly mistakes in the future.

The recent recession wreaked havoc on education funding. Jobs were lost, new facility construction decreased and maintenance of existing facilities was deferred. Despite a recovering economy, the funding for education remains low. The trend has shifted from building new, to taking care of what we have and prioritizing projects.

To regain financial support for education we need to regain the publics’ trust. Community involvement in the planning process, and defensible data, are necessary in order to support the messages we send — messages that must be sent by educational leaders who display competence, exhibit integrity and are true to their word. It is always easier to gain trust than to restore it.

This article originally appeared in the issue of .

Featured

  • Embry-Riddle Completes Construction on Research, Lab Facility

    Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (ERAU) in Daytona Beach, Fla., recently announced the end of construction on a new research and lab facility on campus. The Center for Aerospace Engineering II (CAT II) will support aerospace research and technology development and broke ground last summer.

  • Dallas ISD Voters Approve $6.2B Bond Package

    Dallas ISD voters have approved a record-setting $6.2-billion bond package that district leaders say will modernize aging campuses, eliminate portable classrooms and reshape learning environments across one of the nation’s largest school systems.

  • UCF Modernizes College of Hospitality Management

    The University of Central Florida in Orlando, Fla., recently completed a major renovation effort for the Rosen College of Hospitality Management, according to a news release. The project modernized 77,600 square feet worth of academic classrooms, teaching labs, and collaborative spaces to support both students and faculty.

  • Rethinking K-12 Schools as a Continuous Learning Experience

    Most students move through three or more separate facilities during their K-12 journey, yet the built environments they encounter at each stage have traditionally been designed in isolation, with little continuity in spatial language, learning philosophy, or physical resources. Each new school is a reset with different layouts, learning models, expectations, and ways of moving through a building. The next generation of school design is making the case that the first day of kindergarten and the last day of high school can and should feel connected through common support systems and infrastructure in the physical environment.