Succession Planning

How many of us take the time to review succession planning opportunities? The key word is time! With all the responsibilities and “balls in the air,” how do we find the time? We can always choose to “kick the can down the road,” or to use the sport vernacular, “just wait ‘til next year!” But should we?

Typically the succession planning process allows us to identify future departmental leaders, individual and organizational weaknesses, strengths and potential training/development opportunities for people within the organization. It sounds like a rather important part of any organization’s plan/strategy, but how many departments and/or organizations actually take the time to access their talent? That seems to be one of the most important aspects of succession planning! So how do we get started?

One of first things to put in place is performance evaluations. Set the interval of when to have them completed. Some organizations target the end of the year when pay increases are near, others establish dates based on the current organization’s schedule. Once the intervals are established, work with your team to have them performed in a timely manner and work on consistency related to expectations. Everyone seems to evaluate differently, so when establishing performance evaluation criteria this needs to be considered.

Performance Evaluations, a Rite of Passage

Summer is a busy time for most universities as preparations are underway to get the campus ready for the return of students, faculty and staff. Projects need to be scheduled so as to not interrupt classes or residential move in, but with the understanding there will always be the last-minute items and projects that must be completed.

Sometime during the year most organizations conduct employees’ evaluations. These annual evaluations give all of us a chance to pause, reflect and have a discussion on an individuals’ performance and the team’s performance. Don’t forget to include your own personal performance, as well as how everyone did regarding their goals and if they were they completed successfully. These evaluation discussions tend to gravitate toward items related to things gone right and things gone wrong throughout the past year. Don’t be afraid to raise the bar on accountability regarding expectations, and there must be commitment to the process related to both the supervisor and employee. There should be no surprises during the evaluation, and any performance issues should have been addressed throughout the year and at the time of the occurrence/issue as opposed to waiting for the annual evaluation.

Remember, in order for your team to improve and prosper, you need them to understand expectations. If you don’t meet with them throughout the year, how do you expect for them to improve their performance? It won’t happen thorough osmosis!

Consistency; Keeping It Real

One of the key items related to succession planning is creating a matrix with defined measurables for comparison and to help evaluate the individuals on your team. Each year you should rank your team members from top to bottom based on talent using this matrix as a guide. Some of the items I have seen used for these rankings, which typically have a rating attached to it, include: accomplishments, quality of work, professional knowledge, teamwork, leadership, resource management and communication. There can always be other criteria depending on the organization and department.

The first challenge has always been to have consistency when it comes to the individuals performing the ratings. Many organizations improve the consistency by conducting training classes on how to schedule and perform the individual appraisals. The second challenge is the ranking of the team members. This can be a very difficult task; work your way through it with your management team. Once the rankings are completed you will now have the opportunity to develop training for the team and for certain individuals while developing stretch assignments for the high-potential employees. Keeping in mind, of course, that past performance does not always guarantee a successful performance in the future.

If implemented and orchestrated correctly, succession planning identifies future leaders and high potentials. The process can be challenging, as there are always going to be political ramifications and emotional challenges related to the staff and organization. Remember this process is not the end-all but only the beginning.

This article originally appeared in the issue of .

About the Author

Bruce A. Meyer, Ed.D., is assistant vice president of Campus Operations at Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH, appointed in April 2010. His team currently manages 5,000,000 square feet on a campus with over 20,000 students, faculty and staff.

Featured

  • UCNJ Launches $30M Modernization of Physical Education Center

    The Union College of Union County (UCNJ) in Cranford, N.J., recently broke ground on a new $30-million modernization project for its Physical Education Center (PECK), according to a news release. The college partnered with DIGroup Architecture for the project’s design, transitioning the existing 42,000-square-foot structure into a campus hub for student athletics and campus life.

  • UNL Kiewit Hall

    Designing for Engineering Excellence: Integrating Sustainability and Wellness at UNLs Kiewit Hall

    Kiewit Hall at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln exemplifies how academic institutions can integrate sustainability and wellness into modern learning environments. With an integrated and collaborative team approach, Kiewit Hall addresses enhanced learning and creativity, physical health, and mental wellness, and fosters a sense of community through innovative design, operations, and policy solutions.

  • DLR Group Appoints New K–12 Education Practice Leader

    Integrated design firm DLR Group recently announced that it has named its new global K–12 Education leader, Senior Principal Carmen Wyckoff, AIA, LEED AP, according to a news release. Her teams have members in all 36 of the firm’s offices in the U.S., Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Europe, and Asia.

  • LAN, Inc. Opens Office in College Station, Texas

    Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc. (LAN) recently announced the opening of a new office in College Station, Texas, to support its regional client base, according to a news release. The organization provides engineering, design, and program management services for water, wastewater, transportation, stormwater, and education clients in the Brazos Valley.

Digital Edition