Cooperative Purchasing Contracts Can Help Schools Stay Within Budgets

Over the last several years there has been a proliferation of purchasing cooperatives in the education space and it’s easy to see why. Today’s procurement professionals continue to face the daunting challenge of spending less and getting more. Be it through increased efficiencies, aggregated knowledge or leveraging resources, cooperative purchasing contracts can help.

Strength in Numbers

The sheer volume of purchasing power aggregated by the size of the cooperative provides individual members with economies of scale — and pricing advantages — they would likely not be able to achieve on their own. Add to that the considerable time savings associated with researching new product categories, sourcing competitive quotes, and negotiating pricing. By eliminating time spent on these tasks, resources can be reallocated to focus on more strategic projects.

Cooperative contracts can also represent a revenue generating tool. On top of exclusive savings and rebates, a true member-owned cooperative typically shares its profits with members in the form of “patronage” refunds, which are based on a member’s annual purchases.

Time Efficiencies

“We average approximately 100 days from beginning to end, in terms of conducting an RFP,” said Rick Gay, Procurement Officer at Houston Independent School District. “Utilizing a contract that has already gone through a bid process means we have immediate access to an agreement that adheres to our board policies or state statutes. It also means we can quickly conduct a market trend analysis to ensure we’re in compliance with federal spend regulations.”

The procurement team at Houston ISD comprises 12 sourcing specialists that typically conduct 350-400 solicitations per year. That requires a significant amount of time and resources, and every measure of savings helps. “It’s all about ensuring that our end users get what they need, at the best price available, as quickly as possible,” Rick said. “If that means using a cooperative contract, I’m in!”

This article originally appeared in the issue of .

Featured

  • Building Beyond Simulation: Creating Immersive Ecosystems for Healthcare Education

    Health sciences education is one of the fastest-growing facility types in colleges and universities. The demand for medical, nursing, and allied health professionals is driving the creation and renovation of medical simulation training facilities that provide students with real-world experience through advanced simulation-based learning.

  • How Proactive Maintenance Can Transform Athletic Facilities into Strategic Assets for College Sports

    College athletics is entering one of the most transformative periods in its history. With NIL reshaping financial models and competitive expectations, athletic departments across the country are being asked to do more than ever with increasingly constrained resources.

  • Rethinking K-12 Schools as a Continuous Learning Experience

    Most students move through three or more separate facilities during their K-12 journey, yet the built environments they encounter at each stage have traditionally been designed in isolation, with little continuity in spatial language, learning philosophy, or physical resources. Each new school is a reset with different layouts, learning models, expectations, and ways of moving through a building. The next generation of school design is making the case that the first day of kindergarten and the last day of high school can and should feel connected through common support systems and infrastructure in the physical environment.

  • Georgia State University Opens New Research Tower

    Georgia State University in Atlanta, Ga., recently held a ribbon-cutting ceremony for a new, nine-story, 155,000-square-foot Research Tower, according to university news. Amenities include academic classrooms, a large lecture space, teaching labs, faculty research space, and the uppermost floors reserved for future expansion.