Concise Brief Considers School Choice Policies and Segregation

East Lansing, Mich. – Despite advocates advancing the notion that integration can be promoted by increased school choice, a new brief released today considers the research evidence of those policies. The concise brief concludes that while choice policies may be designed and implemented in ways intended to advance integration; the result has been increased stratification.

As a part of a new series of short, concise policy briefs produced by the National Education Policy Center (NEPC), William J. Mathis and Kevin Welner, University of Colorado Boulder, discuss whether school choice policies actually segregate schools. The compendium of briefs is funded in part by the Great Lakes Center for Education Research and Practice.

In Do Choice Policies Segregate Schools?, Mathis and Welner describe the impact of choice policies on segregation in schools.  The authors contend that while some choice school enrollments are integrated, the research literature documents an “unsettling degree of segregation – particularly in charter schools.”

This is the fourth part of Research-Based Options for Education Policymaking, a multipart brief that takes up a number of important policy issues and identifies policies supported by research. Each section focuses on a different issue, and its recommendations to policymakers are based on the latest scholarship.

The authors investigate the impact of school choice through four lenses: (1) race and ethnicity; (2) poverty; (3) dual language learners; and (4) students with disabilities.

They conclude, “Even without school choice, America’s schools would be shockingly segregated, in part because of housing policies and school district boundaries. School choice policies that do not have sufficient protections against unconstrained, segregative choices do exacerbate the problem.”

As part of the brief, Mathis and Welner provide a list of research-based recommendations for policymakers to advance desegregation in order to provide educational opportunities for all students.

Find the brief on the GLC website:
greatlakescenter.org/research_based_options_2015.php

This concise brief is published by the National Education Policy Center, housed at the University of Colorado Boulder, and is made possible in part by funding from the Great Lakes Center for Education Research and Practice.

This brief is also found on the NEPC website at: nepc.colorado.edu/

About The Great Lakes Center
The mission of the Great Lakes Center for Education Research and Practice is to support and disseminate high quality research and reviews of research for the purpose of informing education policy and to develop research-based resources for use by those who advocate for education reform.  Visit the Great Lakes Center Web Site at: www.greatlakescenter.org.

Featured

  • Campus Safety Requires Using Every Resource Available

    Across the U.S., school and campus leaders are facing a security landscape that has changed dramatically over the past decade. Incidents on school property have increased in recent years, with several consecutive years setting record totals. According to analysis of data by CNN, dozens of shootings now occur on school grounds annually across K-12 and higher education environments.

  • University of Kansas Breaks Ground on Entrepreneurship Hub

    The University of Kansas in Lawrence, Kan., recently held a groundbreaking ceremony for the new KU Entrepreneurship Hub, according to university news. The Hub is part of the university’s School of Business and will include spaces for experiential learning and programming.

  • Philadelphia Middle School Facility Earns LEED Gold Certification

    The Alternative Middle Years (AMY) at James Martin Middle School in Philadelphia, Penn., recently received a LEED Gold certification from the U.S. Green Building Council, according to a news release. The School District of Pennsylvania partnered with KSS Architects on the project.

  • Benson Polytechnic High School in Portland, OR

    Preserving Legacy, Designing for the Future

    As historic academic buildings age, institutions face a difficult decision: preserve and adapt or demolish and rebuild. How do we honor the legacy of these spaces while adapting them to meet the needs of modern learners?