Gaining Popularity

For the better part of the last 20 years, performance-based designs have been promoted as an alternative to traditional or prescriptive building, fire and life safety codes. The reason for this is that performance-based designs are tailored to meet the fire protection and life safety needs of a particular facility. As school facility designs have evolved and become more complex new approaches have increased the necessity and popularity of a performance-based code approach in the United States, but implementation has been slow. The reason for such slow acceptance is due in part to the code restrictions mandated by local and state governments.

Codes and Their Incorporation of Performance-Based Solutions

Performance-based design has been increasing in popularity due to situations where prescriptive codes don’t adequately address or meet the design needs of a more unique facility. Most facility planners and architects would agree that building codes just have not kept pace with technological innovation and current construction practices. To account for this fact, the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) has started to include performance-based options in several of its prescriptive codes, including:

  • NFPA 1 (Uniform Fire Code)
  • NFPA 13 (Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems)
  • NFPA 72 (National Fire Alarm Code)
  • NFPA 101 (Life Safety Code)

The International Code Council (ICC) also addresses performance-based design in documents that include the International Performance Code, International Building Code and International Fire Code.

Performance-based design differs from prescriptive design in that designers can use alternative solutions as long as they meet the stated goal of the performance-based code. The goal is usually very broad and differs from prescriptive codes which spell out exactly what steps should be taken.

Assemble the Design Team

It is important to understand that the district design team should not attempt to create a performance-based design on it’s own. Architects, electrical engineers, mechanical engineers, as well as fire protection engineers and representatives from the user and local authorities all need to work together during the design, construction and acceptance of a performance-based design. Highly skilled engineers, designers and safety professionals understand the purpose and goals of both prescriptive and performance methods. They also understand that there are pros and cons to both methods. One simply does not replace the other.

Long-Term Impact

The district must also understand what the long-term impacts of a performance-based approach will have on building uses and maintenance of critical systems. Too often, maintenance is not adequately funded for highly complex HVAC systems or simple items such as horizontal fire doors. There can be as much as a two- to seven-percent increase in maintenance costs for systems with unique sequencing to control the spread of smoke. The team will need to factor in the upfront cost of performance-based solutions and weigh any upfront savings with long-term maintenance costs.

Functions that may take place inside a performance-based design may be limited. Fuel loads and fire spread are key factors in a performance design. Altering fuel loads may have a negative impact on life safety systems. Changes of use — even minor changes — will require a review of the original performance design parameters to determine if there is a need for modifications to the performance-based design.

There is a place for performance-based design in our schools. The important elements to remember are:

  • With each functional change, new plans must be compared to the original fire safety goals established during the design of the performance-based code compliance document.
  • Initial cost savings must be measured against any increase in long-term maintenance.

Most districts can identify opportunities when a performance-based design is appropriate. Often times, the best building candidates are older historic structures. Performance-based designs can help preserve the historic elements of the building, as well as ensure that modern day life safety is incorporated into the building.

This article originally appeared in the issue of .

About the Author

Mike Halligan is the President of Higher Education Safety, a consulting group specializing in fire prevention program audits, strategic planning, training and education programs and third party plan review and occupancy inspections. He retired after twenty six years as the Associate Director of Environmental Health and Safety and Emergency Management at the University of Utah. He frequently speaks and is a recognized expert on residence hall/student housing fire safety and large scale special event planning. He also works with corporate clients to integrate products into the campus environment that promote safety and security.

Featured

  • Pangram Secures Funding for AI Detection Technology

    Pangram, which provides technology that detects AI-generated text, recently announced that it has secured nearly $4 million in pre-seed and seed funding, according to a news release. The most recent round of investments, totaling $2.7 million, come on top of the pre-existing seed fund of $1.25 million.

  • Empowering People Through Smart, Sustainable Campuses

    Sustainability is facing increasing scrutiny, with some questioning its costs and priorities. Yet for universities, it remains an essential driver of resilience, operational efficiency and long-term competitiveness. At the same time, there is a growing recognition that sustainable transformation is not just about reducing energy consumption and emissions to comply with tightening regulations ‒ it’s about creating vibrant, comfortable environments where people can thrive, innovate and connect. For university leadership, this is a complex balancing act, with rising energy costs and limited budgets only adding to the challenge.

  • Fellowes Launches New 3D Modular, Product Configurators

    Contract interiors and architectural solutions provider Fellowes recently announced the launch of new 3D modular and product configurators for several of its product lines, according to a news release. The new products offer SIF file integration and pricing for the Volo, Markerboards, Sena, and Rising product lines in connection with 3D Cloud, which provides 3D product visualization and 3D digital asset management.

  • Epson Receives Seven AV Industry Awards

    Projectors manufacturer Epson recently announced that it received multiple awards across the Higher Ed AV Awards, SCN Stellar Service Awards, and InfoComm 2025, according to a news release. The company was recognized for three projectors from its PowerLite L-Series line, accessories, installation process, and its customer support team.

Digital Edition