Infrastructure Planning

I am often asked how the Campus Operations team determines what to work on around the campus. The Campus Operations team typically focuses on the day-to-day work orders that we receive through our work-order system. The team is made up of individuals from the Mechanical and Electrical, Plumbing, Sustainability, Grounds, Custodial, HVAC and Sustainability teams. We have more than 33,000 customers who can submit work orders. This number includes students, faculty and staff. We normally average about 2000+ work orders per month that can range from a request to clean up a mess to something much more long-term. We tend to focus on the life-safety issues and building envelopes as a priority. When we develop our plan our method is quite different and is more of a process.

Getting Started

One of the first items we discuss and then develop is a list of items related to large systems and infrastructure that can affect a large number of buildings on campus. The list starts in Campus Operations, where a number of the items are summarized by multiple work orders that have been submitted throughout the year and, ultimately, items that could develop into major issues at any time. The Campus Operations team discusses the mechanical, plumbing, HVAC and electrical aspects of the list.

Sustainability, Grounds and Custodial leadership teams are included in the discussion of the information regarding infrastructure planning. The infrastructure list is very comprehensive, including building envelope components such as roofs, windows and tuck-pointing, utility tunnels, building mechanical systems, landscaping and signage. We also discuss the need for assessments to better determine the severity of the problem. The assessment also helps us with prioritization and potential cost impact against the budget.

Getting Consensus

Now that the list is well on its way to being developed, we meet with the Capital Planning and Design/Construction teams to add to the list or better organize the projects. Sometimes we can combine the projects and sometimes we just develop clarity and understanding. Our major focus for this meeting is to get input and to prioritize the list. This is where the challenges, debates and compromising start to appear, but ultimately we arrive at a conclusion and a solid list to work from that best represents the needs of the university community.

Prioritization is necessary because of limited money coming from the state and local funding models. We also make sure that our list matches up with the campus master plan. It is important to have a plan that indicates the future plans for the campus. Whether you are growing or shrinking the footprint of the campus, a comprehensive master plan helps with organization and direction as well as forecasting funding needs for the university. This master plan can also be a source for information related to philanthropic endeavors as well.

Review Your Plans

Also be sure to review your Building Assessment Plan for items that may match up with the infrastructure list. This can be a bit of a challenge at times because other needs tend to develop over time that may not have been discovered or recognized when the initial Building Assessment Plan was performed.

There are many ways to develop consensus when it comes to developing an Infrastructure Plan or Capital Plan; this process just happens to work the best for our organization.

This article originally appeared in the issue of .

About the Author

Bruce A. Meyer, Ed.D., is assistant vice president of Campus Operations at Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH, appointed in April 2010. His team currently manages 5,000,000 square feet on a campus with over 20,000 students, faculty and staff.

Featured

  • Niles West High School Natatorium Renovation

    Natatoriums are highly specialized spaces, and luminaires in this setting face several unique challenges. Perhaps the most significant is corrosion, which is exacerbated by high indoor humidity, condensation, and pool chemicals, often resulting in material degradation in luminaires not certified to perform in corrosive environments.

  • DLR Group Appoints New K–12 Education Practice Leader

    Integrated design firm DLR Group recently announced that it has named its new global K–12 Education leader, Senior Principal Carmen Wyckoff, AIA, LEED AP, according to a news release. Her teams have members in all 36 of the firm’s offices in the U.S., Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Europe, and Asia.

  • UNL Kiewit Hall

    Designing for Engineering Excellence: Integrating Sustainability and Wellness at UNLs Kiewit Hall

    Kiewit Hall at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln exemplifies how academic institutions can integrate sustainability and wellness into modern learning environments. With an integrated and collaborative team approach, Kiewit Hall addresses enhanced learning and creativity, physical health, and mental wellness, and fosters a sense of community through innovative design, operations, and policy solutions.

  • Spaces4Learning Trends & Predictions for Educational Facilities in 2026: Part II

    As education leaders look toward 2026, the design of K–12 and higher education facilities is being reshaped by powerful, converging forces. Survey respondents point to the rapid growth of Career and Technical Education, deeper alignment with workforce and industry needs, and the accelerating influence of AI and emerging technologies.

Digital Edition