Privatization Solves Housing Woes

If you’ve been around higher education for any length of time, you’re aware that, in the ’90s, enrollment at colleges and universities (especially public institutions) experienced sizeable growth. Baby boomers, as they have in so many other marketing revolutions, were at the foundation of this phenomenon.

In looking at projected campus population figures between now and 2020, enrollment is expected to continue its upward march. This is based on data showing that there are nearly 60 million children enrolled in grades 1 to 12. When they graduate into college freshman status, they will represent the second baby boom.

From a school administrator’s point of view, not only will there be more children of college age than ever before, but more of them will be going to college than at any time in U.S. history.

While the ever-increasing college head-count should delight those charged with running colleges and universities, the budget crunch that nearly every state is facing is having the opposite effect. The monetary woes most states face extend to their ability to fund higher education. Administrators, in turn, face a dilemma as to whether the funding they do receive should be allocated to classrooms, libraries, teacher salaries, laboratories or residence halls.

Privatization, as a method of funding college housing, is allowing universities to allocate tax dollars into more mainstream higher-education needs, while not ignoring their housing needs.

While privatized housing has been a reality for some time, the ’90s increased its popularity as administrators recognized the upcoming head-count crunch. They (and college housing developers) also examined the inventory of residence halls and found them lacking in creature comforts and modernity (most were built before anyone ever heard of the Internet, thus they weren’t wired for today’s cyberspace students).

Privatized student housing is a fairly simple concept. It allows administrators to undertake student housing projects using the efficiencies and creativity of the private sector while maintaining control over the design, operation and quality of the project.

Typically, the college enters into a ground lease with a nonprofit corporation. Under the ground lease, the college is able to exercise design and operational control over the project. The nonprofit corporation participates in a tax-exempt bond issue to provide financing to build the facility. The bond issue is secured solely by project revenues. The bonds are not secured in any way by the college.

Once built, the project can be managed by a private company (or the college’s housing system if desired) in accordance with university guidelines. The college gains the benefit of a quality residential product at competitive rates without incurring a debt obligation on its balance sheet.

Privatization’s popularity received a boost from, of all institutions, the IRS. While not normally seen as a charitable government agency, the IRS late last year confirmed its earlier issuance of the tax-exempt status 501(c)(3) of national housing nonprofit corporations. This makes it possible for colleges to participate in privatized student housing projects without having to go through the time and expense of creating their own nonprofit corporations.

A current example of privatization at work is at Odessa College in Texas. In a project called Century Commons, housing is being built for more than 200 students in two- or four-bedroom units. Opening this fall, the four-bedroom units will be 915 sq. ft. and cost $368 per month on a one-year lease. Two-bedroom apartments will be 615 sq. ft. and cost $406 per month on a yearly lease.

Rent includes local phone service, electricity allowance, basic cable, water, Internet access, service and maintenance. Residents will enjoy a swimming pool, laundry facilities, 2,500-sq.-ft. clubhouse, private club, study rooms and more.

Gregory V. Johnson is a partner specializing in public finance in the Denver office of Patton Boggs, LLP, a law firm based in Washington. He can be reached at [email protected].

Featured

  • Springfield Breaks Ground on $53.7M Pipkin Middle School Rebuild

    Construction is underway on a new, state-of-the-art Pipkin Middle School in Springfield, Mo., a major step in Springfield Public Schools’ (SPS) long-term facility improvement plan, according to local news. The $53.7-million project officially broke ground in early June, following years of planning and community input aimed at modernizing aging infrastructure and addressing student capacity concerns.

  • ProTeam Launches GoFit 6 HEPA Backpack Vacuum

    Technology leader Emerson recently introduced the new ProTeam GoFit 6 HEPA backpack vacuum, according to a news release. The vacuum was designed to capture 99.97% of particulates down to 0.3 microns—including atmospheric hazards like lead dust, mold spores, and other particulates—through an advanced filtration system.

  • California High School Starts Construction on New CTE Building

    Analy High School, part of the West Sonoma County Union High School District (WSCUHSD) in Sebastopol, Calif., recently broke ground on a new Career Technical Education (CTE) Building, according to a news release. The 15,000-square-foot facility will offer specialized facilities for students in engineering, welding, culinary arts, agricultural sciences, and design thinking.

  • modern college building with circuit and brain motifs

    Anthropic Introduces Claude for Education

    Anthropic has launched a version of its Claude AI assistant tailored for higher education institutions. Claude for Education "gives academic institutions secure, reliable AI access for their entire community," the company said, to enable colleges and universities to develop and implement AI-enabled approaches across teaching, learning, and administration.

Digital Edition