Lack of Reporting on Teacher Preparation Fails to Safeguard Public Interest

Washington, D.C. – A new Databurst from the National Council on Teacher Quality (NCTQ), Maintaining strong elementary content requirements for prospective teachers, documents the fact that 49 states do not publish the elementary content state licensing test data that the public needs. These data would reveal programs' varying first-time pass rates, which would provide important information to aspiring elementary teachers about program quality. States instituted these tests to ensure that aspiring elementary teachers have a firm grasp of mathematics, English language arts, science, and social studies and candidates who do not ultimately pass the test will not qualify for a standard teaching license. 

While federal law requires that states report licensure test pass rates for their teacher preparation program completers, programs may define “program completers” as those candidates who have both finished the program requirements and passed their licensure tests—disregarding the sometimes significant numbers of candidates who fail their tests. The result is that programs and states are able to accurately report extremely high “pass rates”, even though their actual pass rates may be a fraction of what they report. 

Recent NCTQ analysis of ETS data for the most common elementary content licensure test revealed that fewer than half of aspiring elementary teachers pass this test the first time they take it, and the pass rate after multiple attempts is still only 72 percent. Failure to publicly report first-time and final pass rate data for all test takers—not just “program completers”—in elementary teacher preparation programs has meant that insufficiencies of teacher preparation programs remain hidden from the public. 

“The lack of transparency in the data states and programs report obscures the reality of variation in program quality,” said NCTQ President Kate Walsh. “This is a consumer protection issue. Aspiring teachers deserve to know which programs are most likely to help them be prepared both to pass their licensing tests and for the classroom.”

In addition to details on each state’s pass rate reporting, the NCTQ analysis includes a review of the quality of each state’s required elementary content licensure test. These tests vary significantly in quality, with fewer than half of states (22) requiring aspiring elementary teachers to pass separately scored subtests in each core content area. Without such subtests, strong knowledge in one core content area may compensate for deficiencies in another.

See the full NCTQ data, analysis, and recommendations for all 50 states and the District of Columbia here.

Featured

  • Montclair State University Debuts New VR Facility

    Montclair State University in Montclair, N.J., recently announced the completion of a new virtual reality learning facility developed in partnership with Dreamscape Learn, according to a news release. The 2,450-square-foot lab space is inside the College of Communication and Media building and will serve students pursuing careers in digital media, virtual reality, and content creation.

  • S4L Announces 2026 Education Design Showcase Winners

    Spaces4Learning is thrilled to announce the winners of the 2026 Education Design Showcase! Now in its 27th year, the annual awards program honors innovative solutions in planning, design, architecture, and construction across K–12 and higher education.

  • New Jersey Day School Opens New Science & Entrepreneurship Building

    Saddle River Day School (SRDS) in Saddle River, N.J., recently celebrated the grand opening of the new Dr. Kristen Walsh Hall of Science & Entrepreneurship, according to a news release. The school partnered with DIG Architecture on the 32,000 square foot facility, completed on a 17-month construction timeline in time for the beginning of the new school year.

  • Planning with Clarity: Using AI to Make Better Campus Decisions, Not Just Better Designs

    Higher education leaders are being asked to make increasingly high-stakes decisions about campus facilities amid greater uncertainty than ever before. Social and economic pressures, shifting enrollment, and evolving learning models compete with growing deferred maintenance needs to strain even the most robust infrastructure budgets.